HTFC Forums

H.T.F.C.

How To Fix Computers





Go Back   HTFC Forums > Software Newsgroups > Windows XP > XP Networking

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1  
Old 04-13-2004, 10:20 PM
Alan Muller [MSFT]
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: direct cable connection

Parallel is definitely quicker. It is approximately twice as fast as a
serial ports at 9600 baud.

There are other factors you may want to consider, for example: cable length,
error rate, etc.

At cable lengths of less than 10 feet, you won't have any worries with
parallel.

--
Alan Muller
Software Design Engineer in Test

Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup
purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Řivind Reinemo" <oeivinr@online.no> wrote in message
news:eQaAolWIEHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> which is the quicker connection parallell or serial?
>
>



Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brief periodic loss of cable connection the captain Windows XP 1 09-12-2007 02:09 PM
Using WMC with an antenna and cable connection tony772 Windows Vista 0 09-08-2007 05:38 PM
Direct Serial Connection Carey XP Networking 0 04-13-2004 03:26 PM
Direct cable connection Mark XP Networking 2 04-13-2004 12:53 AM
Direct Cable Connect problem Andre XP Networking 0 04-10-2004 12:19 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
© 2004 - 2007 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd. Usenet and forums posts © their respective authors.
Ad Management by RedTyger