Much appreciate some advice here. I've read posting on clearing the temp
files in the sub-directory under documents and setting (there ... that shows
my age .... sub-directory??? ... FOLDERS Man!). But what about temp files and
folders in the Temp sub-directory in the Windows directory. Can I delete
these without risk?
Spybot reckons I can. Apparently some of the temp folders/files can cause
the spybot search and destroy routine to simply hang. According to task
manager, the program is still running tho
--
JUST-TEMPING
"FRD-UK" wrote
> Much appreciate some advice here. I've read posting on clearing the temp
> files in the sub-directory under documents and setting (there ... that
> shows
> my age .... sub-directory??? ... FOLDERS Man!). But what about temp files
> and
> folders in the Temp sub-directory in the Windows directory. Can I delete
> these without risk?
>
> Spybot reckons I can. Apparently some of the temp folders/files can cause
> the spybot search and destroy routine to simply hang. According to task
> manager, the program is still running tho
Yes, those can and should be deleted as well. Anything in use windows won't
let you delete it.
START | RUN
Type %temp% & press ENTER
CTRL + A (select all)
DEL (delete) & press ENTER
Not all files will be deleted & they include files that start with a '~'
unless they are a day old or older
Don't bother installing any cleaning program because its just more rubbish
to clutter your system
--
Newbie Coder
(It's just a name)
"FRD-UK" <FRDUK@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FB0FD091-DD32-454B-A99B-1614B06893C2@microsoft.com...
> Much appreciate some advice here. I've read posting on clearing the temp
> files in the sub-directory under documents and setting (there ... that
shows
> my age .... sub-directory??? ... FOLDERS Man!). But what about temp files
and
> folders in the Temp sub-directory in the Windows directory. Can I delete
> these without risk?
>
> Spybot reckons I can. Apparently some of the temp folders/files can cause
> the spybot search and destroy routine to simply hang. According to task
> manager, the program is still running tho
> --
> JUST-TEMPING
Thanks for the response guys. One thing tho, When I try RUN>%temp%, it only
brings up the files in the document and setting temp sub-directory. Generally
I have to go to the temp directory under WINDOWS to access the others. Tried
it this morning. Believe or not, I found 34,000 (no kidding) temp files, and
those outside temp sub-folders too, 98% of which where of 0 [zero] kilobyte
size!!! What the hell happened to efficient housekeeping code within windows!
Thanks again
--
XP User
"Newbie Coder" wrote:
> FRD-UK,
>
> START | RUN
> Type %temp% & press ENTER
> CTRL + A (select all)
> DEL (delete) & press ENTER
>
> Not all files will be deleted & they include files that start with a '~'
> unless they are a day old or older
>
> Don't bother installing any cleaning program because its just more rubbish
> to clutter your system
>
> --
> Newbie Coder
> (It's just a name)
>
>
> "FRD-UK" <FRDUK@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:FB0FD091-DD32-454B-A99B-1614B06893C2@microsoft.com...
> > Much appreciate some advice here. I've read posting on clearing the temp
> > files in the sub-directory under documents and setting (there ... that
> shows
> > my age .... sub-directory??? ... FOLDERS Man!). But what about temp files
> and
> > folders in the Temp sub-directory in the Windows directory. Can I delete
> > these without risk?
> >
> > Spybot reckons I can. Apparently some of the temp folders/files can cause
> > the spybot search and destroy routine to simply hang. According to task
> > manager, the program is still running tho
> > --
> > JUST-TEMPING
>
>
>
>Thanks for the response guys. One thing tho, When I try RUN>%temp%, it only
>brings up the files in the document and setting temp sub-directory. Generally
>I have to go to the temp directory under WINDOWS to access the others. Tried
>it this morning. Believe or not, I found 34,000 (no kidding) temp files, and
>those outside temp sub-folders too, 98% of which where of 0 [zero] kilobyte
>size!!! What the hell happened to efficient housekeeping code within windows!
>Thanks again
Windows XP has stopped using the \Windows\Temp folder as the default
and instead uses \Documents and Settings\<user name>\Local
Settings\Temp. Anything that is still going into \Windows\Temp is
being created by an application program that has been hard-coded to
use that folder instead of complying with the operating system
standards.
Are you by chance running (or rather are you infested with) an older
version of Norton Antivirus? I seem to recall that this behavior is
one of the myriad of misdeeds that Norton crapware can cause.
Good luck
Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2008)
On-Line Help Computer Service http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
Syberfix Remote Computer Repair
"Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
has never been in bed with a mosquito."
> Thanks for the response guys. One thing tho, When I try RUN>%temp%, it
> only brings up the files in the document and setting temp sub-directory.
> Generally I have to go to the temp directory under WINDOWS to access the
> others. Tried it this morning. Believe or not, I found 34,000 (no
> kidding) temp files, and those outside temp sub-folders too, 98% of
> which where of 0 [zero] kilobyte size!!! What the hell happened to
> efficient housekeeping code within windows! Thanks again
Nothing wrong with running the free, "CCleaner".
It attacks lots of temp garbage. Made one of the PC mags this month, too.
Hi
No I haven't installed Norton, although it did come bundled with the laptop
which I bought last year. You're probably right tho as I have installed loads
of my favourite software some of which pre-date Windows XP(and even WIN
98!!!). Anyone remember AmiPro V7 which I still use in preference to MS Word.
Efficient code, fast, highly intuative and does just about everything Word
does twice as fast and with half the hassle. It came on just 7 1.44Mb
floppies!
--
XP User
"Ron Martell" wrote:
> FRD-UK <FRDUK@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >Thanks for the response guys. One thing tho, When I try RUN>%temp%, it only
> >brings up the files in the document and setting temp sub-directory. Generally
> >I have to go to the temp directory under WINDOWS to access the others. Tried
> >it this morning. Believe or not, I found 34,000 (no kidding) temp files, and
> >those outside temp sub-folders too, 98% of which where of 0 [zero] kilobyte
> >size!!! What the hell happened to efficient housekeeping code within windows!
> >Thanks again
>
> Windows XP has stopped using the \Windows\Temp folder as the default
> and instead uses \Documents and Settings\<user name>\Local
> Settings\Temp. Anything that is still going into \Windows\Temp is
> being created by an application program that has been hard-coded to
> use that folder instead of complying with the operating system
> standards.
>
> Are you by chance running (or rather are you infested with) an older
> version of Norton Antivirus? I seem to recall that this behavior is
> one of the myriad of misdeeds that Norton crapware can cause.
>
> Good luck
>
> Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
> --
> Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2008)
> On-Line Help Computer Service
> http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
> Syberfix Remote Computer Repair
>
> "Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
> has never been in bed with a mosquito."
>
FRD-UK wrote:
> Thanks for the response guys. One thing tho, When I try RUN>%temp%, it only
> brings up the files in the document and setting temp sub-directory. Generally
> I have to go to the temp directory under WINDOWS to access the others. Tried
> it this morning. Believe or not, I found 34,000 (no kidding) temp files, and
> those outside temp sub-folders too, 98% of which where of 0 [zero] kilobyte
> size!!! What the hell happened to efficient housekeeping code within windows!
> Thanks again
Thanks to everyone who helped out. SUCCESS!
Also tried CCleaner. Fabulous little program, Fast, efficient and thorough.
I'd highly recommend it.
--
XP User
=?Utf-8?B?RlJELVVL?= wrote:
>
> Much appreciate some advice here. I've read posting on clearing the temp
> files in the sub-directory under documents and setting (there ... that shows