I am in the process of building a new machine used primarily for web and
Windows Server applications. Visual Studio, SQL Server, remote
connectivity, monitoring, etc. Would you consider Vista reliable and
dependable enough to use as a primary OS?
Sorry, I meant web and Windows Server applications development....
<msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OckE1rHCIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I am in the process of building a new machine used primarily for web and
>Windows Server applications. Visual Studio, SQL Server, remote
>connectivity, monitoring, etc. Would you consider Vista reliable and
>dependable enough to use as a primary OS?
>
<msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:OckE1rHCIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
I am in the process of building a new machine used primarily for web and
Windows Server applications. Visual Studio, SQL Server, remote
connectivity, monitoring, etc. Would you consider Vista reliable and
dependable enough to use as a primary OS?
Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. However, based on my further reading,
it doesn't seem that a lot of others agree. XP SP2 has been very reliable
for me and I am simply afraid of making the move to Vista only to find that
I get lots of troubles.
"Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
news:11A422CA-F64E-40B9-A3DB-A6FA4DE5B0C5@microsoft.com...
> Windows Vista is, by far, the most secure and dependable
> operating system available. By all means install and use it!
>
> --
> Carey Frisch
> Microsoft MVP
> Windows Shell/User
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:OckE1rHCIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> I am in the process of building a new machine used primarily for web and
> Windows Server applications. Visual Studio, SQL Server, remote
> connectivity, monitoring, etc. Would you consider Vista reliable and
> dependable enough to use as a primary OS?
>
yo dude u should take the leap for vista...by far no one was really
concerned with vista and doesnt know its true power...i just built a
computer 3 weeks ago with the specs listed below and it is amazing..u
might need to remove some bugs in the 64bit version and if u do have
problems jus let me know
<msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OWeek3HCIHA.4712@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. However, based on my further reading,
> it doesn't seem that a lot of others agree. XP SP2 has been very reliable
> for me and I am simply afraid of making the move to Vista only to find
> that I get lots of troubles.
>
>
Well, if you're trying to use a 64 bit version of Vista, then you might run
into trouble. I have had no problems using Vista Ultimate 32 bit in by Web
development. There are distinct advantages of using Vista and IIS7 over XP
Pro and IIS6. Just like the developers had to move to XP pro from Win 2k
pro, they are going to move to the Vista Business classed O/S(s) that are
running IIS7 so they can develop more powerful applications that take
advantage of Win 2k3 server and Win 2k8 server running IIS7.
"Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
news:11A422CA-F64E-40B9-A3DB-A6FA4DE5B0C5@microsoft.com...
> Windows Vista is, by far, the most secure and dependable
> operating system available. By all means install and use it!
You on drugs or something? Using Vista with Visual Studio is wrong. There
are patches for VS and still there are problems. Vista IS NOT ready for
prime time with the development suites.
Typical fanboy answer. KISS MICROSOFT A$$. Microsoft is Great. You
probably think that there is no need for a service pack!
>
> --
> Carey Frisch
> Microsoft MVP
> Windows Shell/User
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:OckE1rHCIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> I am in the process of building a new machine used primarily for web and
> Windows Server applications. Visual Studio, SQL Server, remote
> connectivity, monitoring, etc. Would you consider Vista reliable and
> dependable enough to use as a primary OS?
>
<msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OWeek3HCIHA.4712@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. However, based on my further reading,
> it doesn't seem that a lot of others agree. XP SP2 has been very reliable
> for me and I am simply afraid of making the move to Vista only to find
> that I get lots of troubles.
>
>
OK, then. Looks like you've answered your own question.
See ya.
Well, I disagree. If you wish to install Windows XP,
an O/S fast approaching its intended end-of-life-cycle,
you won't be sorry. However, it is not as secure
and reliable as Windows Vista has proven to be.
<msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:OWeek3HCIHA.4712@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. However, based on my further reading,
it doesn't seem that a lot of others agree. XP SP2 has been very reliable
for me and I am simply afraid of making the move to Vista only to find that
I get lots of troubles.
"Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
news:11A422CA-F64E-40B9-A3DB-A6FA4DE5B0C5@microsoft.com...
> Windows Vista is, by far, the most secure and dependable
> operating system available. By all means install and use it!
>
> --
> Carey Frisch
> Microsoft MVP
> Windows Shell/User
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:OckE1rHCIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> I am in the process of building a new machine used primarily for web and
> Windows Server applications. Visual Studio, SQL Server, remote
> connectivity, monitoring, etc. Would you consider Vista reliable and
> dependable enough to use as a primary OS?
>
WARNING >> do not even go close to a vista OS with a 10 mile long stick
Fanboys like carey are very irresponsible and dangerous with their ill
advice they can make you miserable and in the end very angry.
<msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OWeek3HCIHA.4712@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. However, based on my further reading,
> it doesn't seem that a lot of others agree. XP SP2 has been very reliable
> for me and I am simply afraid of making the move to Vista only to find
> that I get lots of troubles.
>
>
> "Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:11A422CA-F64E-40B9-A3DB-A6FA4DE5B0C5@microsoft.com...
>> Windows Vista is, by far, the most secure and dependable
>> operating system available. By all means install and use it!
>>
>> --
>> Carey Frisch
>> Microsoft MVP
>> Windows Shell/User
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:OckE1rHCIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> I am in the process of building a new machine used primarily for web and
>> Windows Server applications. Visual Studio, SQL Server, remote
>> connectivity, monitoring, etc. Would you consider Vista reliable and
>> dependable enough to use as a primary OS?
>>
>
Reliable OS? 
Linear Mode
