Businesses remain unconvinced about the benefits of moving to Microsoft's
Windows Vista operating system and most are delaying any plans to upgrade
until 2009 at the earliest.
One year after the business launch of Vista, only one of silicon.com's
12-strong CIO Jury IT user panel said they had plans to move to the new OS
in 2008.
Most plan to stick with the stability of Windows XP and implement Service
Pack 3 for that OS before they even start thinking about Vista.
Adrian Hughes, head of IS for insurance company Amlin, said: "We are
sticking with XP and look to take XP SP3 in 2009. Vista not until 2011,
unless there is a good reason to migrate, by which time the next OS may be
out so we would then skip a generation."
The Maritime & Coastguard Agency isn't planning to upgrade to Vista for two
to three years.
Ο "thai bear" <ber@df.kol> έγραψε στο μήνυμα
news:474ea566@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> Businesses delay Vista plans until 2009
>
> Theyb should wait until wondows 7, vista is crap and
> only dumb people like vista
>
> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ans-until-2009
>
The point is, they will be deploying Windows, not Linux and they will be
deploying Vista, so its a win-win for Microsoft either way. This typical of
most coporate deployments.
--
Andre
Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
My Vista Quickstart Guide: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
"thai bear" <ber@df.kol> wrote in message
news:474ea566@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> Businesses delay Vista plans until 2009
>
> Theyb should wait until wondows 7, vista is crap and
> only dumb people like vista
>
> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ans-until-2009
>
"thai bear" <ber@df.kol> wrote in message
news:474ea566@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> Businesses delay Vista plans until 2009
>
> Theyb should wait until wondows 7, vista is crap and
> only dumb people like vista
>
> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ans-until-2009
>
Wow. you can cut and paste news articles. Did you learn that in class
yesterday? Just FYI. Mommy should be proud of her little mental retard of
a son.
"only dumb people like vista"
And yet another of your generalizations.
You simply can not comprehend the FACT others successfully use what
you fail with.
Your inability to use Windows Vista has no bearing on the FACT many
are able to successfully use windows.
Your generalizations describe yourself more than anyone else.
"thai bear" <ber@df.kol> wrote in message
news:474ea566@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> Businesses delay Vista plans until 2009
>
> Theyb should wait until wondows 7, vista is crap and
> only dumb people like vista
>
> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ans-until-2009
Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin] wrote:
> The point is, they will be deploying Windows, not Linux and they will be
> deploying Vista, so its a win-win for Microsoft either way. This typical of
> most coporate deployments.
No, the point is they are keeping their options open, until Microsoft
get the check nothing is certain, and it may have been typical until now
but that also is not guaranteed. No organization can guarantee what
circumstances they will find themselves in a year from now. Plans do not
always work out.
Why you remain unconcerned about the fact that competition is becoming
more and more capable, a fact that Microsoft themselves appear to be
concerned about but seem unable to identify the cause of, is quite
surprising.
Pride often comes before a fall, an old saying but nonetheless true.
The single most important thing any business portrays to it's clients is
attitude. Enough said.
Well said. In fact, you are the one who really cares about MS.
Andre is the kind of person who will bring down a company.
"Charlie Tame" <charlie@tames.net> wrote in message
news:elPhGErMIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin] wrote:
>> The point is, they will be deploying Windows, not Linux and they will be
>> deploying Vista, so its a win-win for Microsoft either way. This typical
>> of most coporate deployments.
>
>
> No, the point is they are keeping their options open, until Microsoft get
> the check nothing is certain, and it may have been typical until now but
> that also is not guaranteed. No organization can guarantee what
> circumstances they will find themselves in a year from now. Plans do not
> always work out.
>
> Why you remain unconcerned about the fact that competition is becoming
> more and more capable, a fact that Microsoft themselves appear to be
> concerned about but seem unable to identify the cause of, is quite
> surprising.
>
> Pride often comes before a fall, an old saying but nonetheless true.
>
> The single most important thing any business portrays to it's clients is
> attitude. Enough said.
> The point is, they will be deploying Windows, not Linux and they will be
> deploying Vista, so its a win-win for Microsoft either way.
Read that again. So, you are writing "unbiased" reviews?
"Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O3%23bHHpMIHA.4948@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> The point is, they will be deploying Windows, not Linux and they will be
> deploying Vista, so its a win-win for Microsoft either way. This typical
> of most coporate deployments.
> --
> Andre
> Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
> My Vista Quickstart Guide:
> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
> "thai bear" <ber@df.kol> wrote in message
> news:474ea566@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> Businesses delay Vista plans until 2009
>>
>> Theyb should wait until wondows 7, vista is crap and
>> only dumb people like vista
>>
>> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ans-until-2009
>>
>
>
I mentioned in another thread that I never thought people are stupid - I
meant it.
Whenever I came to this newsgroup, I always have a thought about if people
know how big the world really is and how many talents and wise person out
there? I don't know either but I know it's more than my tiny brain can
take.
People are not stupid. Stupid people are those who think so.
Best wishes for bye for now.
"Charlie Tame" <charlie@tames.net> wrote in message
news:elPhGErMIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin] wrote:
>> The point is, they will be deploying Windows, not Linux and they will be
>> deploying Vista, so its a win-win for Microsoft either way. This typical
>> of most coporate deployments.
>
>
> No, the point is they are keeping their options open, until Microsoft get
> the check nothing is certain, and it may have been typical until now but
> that also is not guaranteed. No organization can guarantee what
> circumstances they will find themselves in a year from now. Plans do not
> always work out.
>
> Why you remain unconcerned about the fact that competition is becoming
> more and more capable, a fact that Microsoft themselves appear to be
> concerned about but seem unable to identify the cause of, is quite
> surprising.
>
> Pride often comes before a fall, an old saying but nonetheless true.
>
> The single most important thing any business portrays to it's clients is
> attitude. Enough said.