19" non-widescreen opinions needed

I mainly play older games, ones that don't require widescreen. Has
any manufacturer released a quality 19" non-widescreen fairly
recently, with fast gaming response times? I've heard good things
about NEC and Viewsonic monitors, but their 19" non-widescreen
versions have been discontinued. (Or maybe now is a good time to pick
up a bargain?)

Thanks, regards, Robert.

In article <dd0f5019-cbd0-47d1-9c3e-28f2eaf19aec@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
rpgsrockdvds@hotmail.co.uk says...
> I mainly play older games, ones that don't require widescreen. Has
> any manufacturer released a quality 19" non-widescreen fairly
> recently, with fast gaming response times? I've heard good things
> about NEC and Viewsonic monitors, but their 19" non-widescreen
> versions have been discontinued. (Or maybe now is a good time to pick
> up a bargain?)
>
> Thanks, regards, Robert.
>

I've had the HP 1955 until a few days ago (swmbo has it now) and it's a very
nice monitor. The successor model HP1965 is still on the market.
I don't play fps type games, but a lot of online rpg and I watch movies on it,
and I have not had any complaints about response times. The 1955 was/is rated
at 16 ms or thereabouts if I remember that right - the 1965 is bound to be
faster since it's not a lcd-stoneage model as mine was.

-P.

--
=========================================
firstname dot lastname at gmail fullstop com

On 15 Mar, 02:23, Peter Huebner <no....@this.address> wrote:
> In article <dd0f5019-cbd0-47d1-9c3e-28f2eaf19...@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
> rpgsrockd...@hotmail.co.uk says...
>
> > I mainly play older games, ones that don't require widescreen. *Has
> > any manufacturer released a quality 19" non-widescreen fairly
> > recently, with fast gaming response times? *I've heard good things
> > about NEC and Viewsonic monitors, but their 19" non-widescreen
> > versions have been discontinued. *(Or maybe now is a good time to pick
> > up a bargain?)
>
> > Thanks, regards, Robert.
>
> I've had the HP 1955 until a few days ago (swmbo has it now) and it's a very
> nice monitor. The successor model HP1965 is still on the market.
> I don't play fps type games, but a lot of online rpg and I watch movies on it,
> and I have not had any complaints about response times. The 1955 was/is rated
> at 16 ms or thereabouts if I remember that right - the 1965 is bound to be
> faster since it's not a lcd-stoneage model as mine was.
>
> -P.
>
> --
> =========================================
> firstname dot lastname at gmail fullstop com

Thanks Peter. AS well as the HP1965, I found browsing the net -

LG L1960TR

Seems like a reasonable LCD.

-Robert.