Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
> Arno Wagner <me@privacy.net> wrote
>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>>> Yes. Currently I'm fighting with firefox font sizes. The screen
>>> resolution is 1400x1050 so I need larger sized fonts. Everything is
>>> fine _except_ the file download dialog, it's so small that I can
>>> barely read it. For all of the other dialogs I can control the font
>>> size, but not this one. Actually I'm beginning to detest FF, especially when
>>> I read that V3 is going to use a database to manage history & bookmarks,
>> Personally I like Opera. Although they have dumbed down the
>> configuration possibilities somewhat in the latest releases.
> FInally got it working so I can _read_ the darn thing. I'm not sure
> how, as I changed both the X font server config & added the
> DisplaySize parameter to xorg.conf. Then restarted X (it is nice to be
> able to reconfigure & restart just the gui, not reboot the whole OS).
> I've heard Seamonkey might be better. I downloaded it, but haven't installed it yet.
> I get the distict impression Fred & Rod haven't a
> clue about what a production environment means.
Guess which pathetic little pig ignorant prat has just got egg all over its pathetic little face, yet again ?
Been involved in it since before you were even born, thanks.
> With multiple servers and a support group that's responsible for them.
Got a big towel handy for your face, prat ?
> When I was in that environment, we tried to document as much
> as possible in the various config files, if comments were allowed.
> At least then there was a good chance that a change would be
> documented. Especially the emergency ones made at 3AM!
And even someone as stupid as you should be able to work
out how to document any GUI, if someone was actually
stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
No wonder you got the bums rush, right out the door.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>> They must not be teaching the meaning of the word "hyperbole" in junior
>> high schools (or middle schools, depending on location) these days.
>
> Or you never ever could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag.
>
You could at least update your insult dictionary periodically, it's
definitely getting old and tired.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>> Arno Wagner <me@privacy.net> wrote
>>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>
>>>> Yes. Currently I'm fighting with firefox font sizes. The screen
>>>> resolution is 1400x1050 so I need larger sized fonts. Everything is
>>>> fine _except_ the file download dialog, it's so small that I can
>>>> barely read it. For all of the other dialogs I can control the font
>>>> size, but not this one. Actually I'm beginning to detest FF, especially when
>>>> I read that V3 is going to use a database to manage history & bookmarks,
>
>>> Personally I like Opera. Although they have dumbed down the
>>> configuration possibilities somewhat in the latest releases.
>
>> FInally got it working so I can _read_ the darn thing. I'm not sure
>> how, as I changed both the X font server config & added the
>> DisplaySize parameter to xorg.conf. Then restarted X (it is nice to be
>> able to reconfigure & restart just the gui, not reboot the whole OS).
>
>> I've heard Seamonkey might be better. I downloaded it, but haven't installed it yet.
>
>> I get the distict impression Fred & Rod haven't a
>> clue about what a production environment means.
>
> Guess which pathetic little pig ignorant prat has just got egg all over its pathetic little face, yet again ?
>
> Been involved in it since before you were even born, thanks.
>
ROTFL! Sure you have.
>> With multiple servers and a support group that's responsible for them.
>
> Got a big towel handy for your face, prat ?
>
How about a brown paper bag for your head?
>> When I was in that environment, we tried to document as much
>> as possible in the various config files, if comments were allowed.
>> At least then there was a good chance that a change would be
>> documented. Especially the emergency ones made at 3AM!
>
> And even someone as stupid as you should be able to work
> out how to document any GUI, if someone was actually
> stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
You really are an imbecile. Documenting is never the problem. Getting
people to _update_ the documentation when making changes is. That's
why I like putting the doc right in the config file, someone just
might keep it updated.
Then of course there's _finding_ the documentation, too.
>
> No wonder you got the bums rush, right out the door.
>
Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>>> Arno Wagner <me@privacy.net> wrote
>>>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>>>>> Yes. Currently I'm fighting with firefox font sizes. The screen
>>>>> resolution is 1400x1050 so I need larger sized fonts. Everything is
>>>>> fine _except_ the file download dialog, it's so small that I can
>>>>> barely read it. For all of the other dialogs I can control the font
>>>>> size, but not this one. Actually I'm beginning to detest FF,
>>>>> especially when I read that V3 is going to use a database to
>>>>> manage history & bookmarks,
>>>> Personally I like Opera. Although they have dumbed down the
>>>> configuration possibilities somewhat in the latest releases.
>>> FInally got it working so I can _read_ the darn thing. I'm not sure
>>> how, as I changed both the X font server config & added the
>>> DisplaySize parameter to xorg.conf. Then restarted X (it is nice to be
>>> able to reconfigure & restart just the gui, not reboot the whole OS).
>>> I've heard Seamonkey might be better.
>>> I downloaded it, but haven't installed it yet.
>>> I get the distict impression Fred & Rod haven't a
>>> clue about what a production environment means.
>> Guess which pathetic little pig ignorant prat has just
>> got egg all over its pathetic little face, yet again ?
>> Been involved in it since before you were even born, thanks.
> ROTFL!
Behaving like a 2 year old cuts no mustard around here, fool.
> Sure you have.
>>> With multiple servers and a support group that's responsible for them.
>> Got a big towel handy for your face, prat ?
> How about a brown paper bag for your head?
Any 2 year old could leave that pathetic excuse for bull**** for dead.
Get one to help you before posting again, if anyone is
actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one.
>>> When I was in that environment, we tried to document as much
>>> as possible in the various config files, if comments were allowed.
>>> At least then there was a good chance that a change would be
>>> documented. Especially the emergency ones made at 3AM!
>> And even someone as stupid as you should be able to work
>> out how to document any GUI, if someone was actually
>> stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
> You really are an imbecile.
You really are a pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist.
> Documenting is never the problem. Getting people to
> _update_ the documentation when making changes is.
Irrelevant to that mindlessly silly **** of yours above.
> That's why I like putting the doc right in the config file,
> someone just might keep it updated.
Or they might not, too.
> Then of course there's _finding_ the documentation, too.
And even someone as stupid as you should be able to work out how
to document any GUI, where that can be found, if someone was
actually stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
No wonder you got the bums rush, right out the door.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>>>> Arno Wagner <me@privacy.net> wrote
>>>>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>
>>>>>> Yes. Currently I'm fighting with firefox font sizes. The screen
>>>>>> resolution is 1400x1050 so I need larger sized fonts. Everything is
>>>>>> fine _except_ the file download dialog, it's so small that I can
>>>>>> barely read it. For all of the other dialogs I can control the font
>>>>>> size, but not this one. Actually I'm beginning to detest FF,
>>>>>> especially when I read that V3 is going to use a database to
>>>>>> manage history & bookmarks,
>
>>>>> Personally I like Opera. Although they have dumbed down the
>>>>> configuration possibilities somewhat in the latest releases.
>
>>>> FInally got it working so I can _read_ the darn thing. I'm not sure
>>>> how, as I changed both the X font server config & added the
>>>> DisplaySize parameter to xorg.conf. Then restarted X (it is nice to be
>>>> able to reconfigure & restart just the gui, not reboot the whole OS).
>
>>>> I've heard Seamonkey might be better.
>>>> I downloaded it, but haven't installed it yet.
>
>>>> I get the distict impression Fred & Rod haven't a
>>>> clue about what a production environment means.
>
>>> Guess which pathetic little pig ignorant prat has just
>>> got egg all over its pathetic little face, yet again ?
>
>>> Been involved in it since before you were even born, thanks.
>
>> ROTFL!
>
> Behaving like a 2 year old cuts no mustard around here, fool.
>
>> Sure you have.
>
>>>> With multiple servers and a support group that's responsible for them.
>
>>> Got a big towel handy for your face, prat ?
>
>> How about a brown paper bag for your head?
>
> Any 2 year old could leave that pathetic excuse for bull**** for dead.
>
> Get one to help you before posting again, if anyone is
> actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one.
>
>>>> When I was in that environment, we tried to document as much
>>>> as possible in the various config files, if comments were allowed.
>>>> At least then there was a good chance that a change would be
>>>> documented. Especially the emergency ones made at 3AM!
>
>>> And even someone as stupid as you should be able to work
>>> out how to document any GUI, if someone was actually
>>> stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
>
>> You really are an imbecile.
>
> You really are a pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist.
>
>> Documenting is never the problem. Getting people to
>> _update_ the documentation when making changes is.
>
> Irrelevant to that mindlessly silly **** of yours above.
>
>> That's why I like putting the doc right in the config file,
>> someone just might keep it updated.
>
> Or they might not, too.
>
>> Then of course there's _finding_ the documentation, too.
>
> And even someone as stupid as you should be able to work out how
> to document any GUI, where that can be found, if someone was
> actually stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
>
> No wonder you got the bums rush, right out the door.
>
>
You're repeating yourself, roddy-boy.
Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote:
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>>>>> Arno Wagner <me@privacy.net> wrote
>>>>>> Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> wrote
>>
>>>>>>> Yes. Currently I'm fighting with firefox font sizes. The screen
>>>>>>> resolution is 1400x1050 so I need larger sized fonts.
>>>>>>> Everything is fine _except_ the file download dialog, it's so
>>>>>>> small that I can barely read it. For all of the other dialogs I
>>>>>>> can control the font size, but not this one. Actually I'm
>>>>>>> beginning to detest FF, especially when I read that V3 is going
>>>>>>> to use a database to manage history & bookmarks,
>>
>>>>>> Personally I like Opera. Although they have dumbed down the
>>>>>> configuration possibilities somewhat in the latest releases.
>>
>>>>> FInally got it working so I can _read_ the darn thing. I'm not
>>>>> sure how, as I changed both the X font server config & added the
>>>>> DisplaySize parameter to xorg.conf. Then restarted X (it is nice
>>>>> to be able to reconfigure & restart just the gui, not reboot the
>>>>> whole OS).
>>
>>>>> I've heard Seamonkey might be better.
>>>>> I downloaded it, but haven't installed it yet.
>>
>>>>> I get the distict impression Fred & Rod haven't a
>>>>> clue about what a production environment means.
>>
>>>> Guess which pathetic little pig ignorant prat has just
>>>> got egg all over its pathetic little face, yet again ?
>>
>>>> Been involved in it since before you were even born, thanks.
>>
>>> ROTFL!
>>
>> Behaving like a 2 year old cuts no mustard around here, fool.
>>
>>> Sure you have.
>>
>>>>> With multiple servers and a support group that's responsible for
>>>>> them.
>>
>>>> Got a big towel handy for your face, prat ?
>>
>>> How about a brown paper bag for your head?
>>
>> Any 2 year old could leave that pathetic excuse for bull**** for
>> dead.
>>
>> Get one to help you before posting again, if anyone is
>> actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one.
>>
>>>>> When I was in that environment, we tried to document as much
>>>>> as possible in the various config files, if comments were allowed.
>>>>> At least then there was a good chance that a change would be
>>>>> documented. Especially the emergency ones made at 3AM!
>>
>>>> And even someone as stupid as you should be able to work
>>>> out how to document any GUI, if someone was actually
>>>> stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
>>
>>> You really are an imbecile.
>>
>> You really are a pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist.
>>
>>> Documenting is never the problem. Getting people to
>>> _update_ the documentation when making changes is.
>>
>> Irrelevant to that mindlessly silly **** of yours above.
>>
>>> That's why I like putting the doc right in the config file,
>>> someone just might keep it updated.
>>
>> Or they might not, too.
>>
>>> Then of course there's _finding_ the documentation, too.
>>
>> And even someone as stupid as you should be able to work out how
>> to document any GUI, where that can be found, if someone was
>> actually stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
>>
>> No wonder you got the bums rush, right out the door.
>>
>>
> You're repeating yourself, roddy-boy.
Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh fool ?
>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote
>> Ron Speed wrote
>>> Arno Wagner <me@privacy.net> wrote
>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>>> We await your apology for accusing Mr Peters of lying.
>
>>>> Hmm. I don't think he has that capability. To full of himself.
>
>>> Corse you always appologise for your ****ups about Win, eh ?
>
>> A technical error like a "****up about Win" is one thing, Ron.
>> Calling a (presumably) honest person a "liar" is quite something else.
>
>He's both, ****wit. You in spades.
Another bald-faced lie from Ron Speed. Documented.
Arno Wagner wrote in news:6bav88F39fcc9U4@mid.individual.net
> Previously chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > Fred (Ron Speed) wrote:
>
> > > > > > Then, of course, there's the new version of some MS product.
> > > > > > All of the menus have been rearranged.
> > >
> > > > > You're lying now.
> > >
> > > > And you're a complete idiot.
> > >
> > > We'll see...
> > >
> > > > Every new version of Word moved menu items around.
> > >
> > > But not one of them had ALL OF THE MENUS REARRANGED, liar.
>
> > Umm, Ron. I've got Word 2007 here, and it sure looks to me like "all
> > of the menus have been rearranged" from the previous version.
>
> > We await your apology for accusing Mr Peters of lying.
> Hmm.
You need to do something about that humming in your head, Babblebot.
> I don't think he has that capability. To full of himself.
Oh look, who's talking.
Mister sidenote advisor babblebot, with the huge killfile.
>
> Likely there is one menu somewhere that has not been rearranged
> and he feels completely justified because of that.
>
> Arno
Re: HD Backup ? 
Linear Mode
