Sean.May <Sean.May.3bulgd@no.email.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> kony <spam@spam.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Then show us the consumer protection law that claims
>>>>>> fit for purpose means something other than advertised,
>>>>>> something other than a spec'd capability.
>>>>> Read the fit for purpose section of any comsumer protection
>>>>> law, it has NOTHING to do with advertising or specs.
>> Those are covered by an entirely different section, 2-313
>> etc which doesnt even mention fitness for purpose.
>>>> Where the seller at the time of contracting has reason to know
>>>> any particular purpose for which the goods are required and
>>>> that the buyer is relying on the seller's skill or judgment to
>>>> select or furnish suitable goods, there is unless excluded or
>>>> modified under the next section an implied warranty that the
>>>> goods shall be fit for such purpose.
>>> When the drive was bought did the manufacturer "know of the
>>> particular purpose" (RAID0 of some exact size other drive)?
>> No one said they did. I JUST rubbed YOUR stupid nose in the FACT
>> that your stupid claims about advertising and specs have NOTHING to
>> do with the fitness for purpose section of the consumer protection laws.