Best Performing SATA 500 and 750 GB drives

We are doing network backups to a NAS, that we want to build on 500 or 750
GB drives. What are the best performing 500 and 750 GB SATA drives that
are under $150/each?

--
Will

Why are you asking here, they are not SCSI?

"Will" <westes-usc@noemail.nospam> wrote in message
news:woudnTkITtI7vvTVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@giganews.com ...
> We are doing network backups to a NAS, that we want to build on 500 or 750
> GB drives. What are the best performing 500 and 750 GB SATA drives that
> are under $150/each?
>

"Eric Gisin" <gisin@uniserve.com> wrote in message
news:4tidnaXPecY8qPTVnZ2dnUVZ_oDinZ2d@posted.unise rvecommunications...
> Why are you asking here, they are not SCSI?

Because there is no Comp.periphs.sata, and this seemed like a reasonable
proxy for that group until it exists....

--
Will


> "Will" <westes-usc@noemail.nospam> wrote in message
> news:woudnTkITtI7vvTVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@giganews.com ...
>> We are doing network backups to a NAS, that we want to build on 500 or
>> 750
>> GB drives. What are the best performing 500 and 750 GB SATA drives that
>> are under $150/each?

SATA and ATA are pretty much the same, neither have their own group.
The PC group comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage has been around forever.

"Will" <westes-usc@noemail.nospam> wrote in message
news:zISdna4E4fI8xPTVnZ2dnUVZ_sPinZ2d@giganews.com ...
> "Eric Gisin" <gisin@uniserve.com> wrote in message
> news:4tidnaXPecY8qPTVnZ2dnUVZ_oDinZ2d@posted.unise rvecommunications...
>> Why are you asking here, they are not SCSI?
>
> Because there is no Comp.periphs.sata, and this seemed like a reasonable proxy for that group
> until it exists....
>