HTFC Forums

H.T.F.C.

How To Fix Computers





Go Back   HTFC Forums > Hardware Newsgroups > Digital Photo > Scanners

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1  
Old 03-08-2008, 08:15 PM
murrayatuptowngallery@yahoo.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default UMAX Mirage IIse questions (film holders & XP SCSI chain)

Hello:

I was just given a UMAX Mirage IIse with transparency adapter. My
other scanner is SCSI so that is resolved.

I did not receive any filmholders. My smaller scanner has holders for
up to 4x5 and a glass tray for 8x10, so I am wondering how far off the
glass larger film/transparencies have to be on the UMAX, or whether
they simply go between the top & bottom glass with no holder.

Also, should a film emulsion face the adapter side?

Lastly, while I got the MagicScan software, I did ask the SilverFast
people about multiple-scanner support and SCSI-2 chaining. They didn't
recommend it.

Is it difficult to get two scanners to cooperate, or is performance
just slow/problematic?

If it works, my interest is in just getting it up & running first. I
could add another SCSI card later if it's a matter of improved
performance.

Thank you

Murray
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Fix your Windows Problems - FAST.
FREE Safe Scan Registry Check. Locate & Fix Errors in Minutes!
  #2  
Old 03-08-2008, 10:26 PM
MoiMoi
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: UMAX Mirage IIse questions (film holders & XP SCSI chain)

In article <18d3ee52-740e-4472-8703-886535214def@
59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, murrayatuptowngallery@yahoo.com says...
> Hello:
>
> I was just given a UMAX Mirage IIse with transparency adapter. My
> other scanner is SCSI so that is resolved.
>
> I did not receive any filmholders. My smaller scanner has holders for
> up to 4x5 and a glass tray for 8x10, so I am wondering how far off the
> glass larger film/transparencies have to be on the UMAX, or whether
> they simply go between the top & bottom glass with no holder.
>
> Also, should a film emulsion face the adapter side?
>
> Lastly, while I got the MagicScan software, I did ask the SilverFast
> people about multiple-scanner support and SCSI-2 chaining. They didn't
> recommend it.
>
> Is it difficult to get two scanners to cooperate, or is performance
> just slow/problematic?
>
> If it works, my interest is in just getting it up & running first. I
> could add another SCSI card later if it's a matter of improved
> performance.
>
> Thank you
>
> Murray


No probs running multiple SCSI scanners.
Just like any other SCSI devices, just need to have their separate ID
numbers on the chain, and chain terminated.
I run an old HP IIcx flatbed and Nikon 2000 on XP Home system.
Can use HP and Nikon software interfaces, or VueScan for both.
Also have old JAZ drive in chain, only because of the cables and device
connections that I wound up with, needed the JAZ in there so could mix
and match different cable pin combos.

MM
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Odd size film holders for V700, how? tinnews@isbd.co.uk Scanners 5 11-29-2007 01:18 PM
IE7 shutdown chain reaction Jack Windows XP 1 09-27-2007 03:53 PM
Quick Questions: IDE (SCSI) vs SATA and SATA2 Cordelia Hardware 2 08-14-2007 05:44 AM
licenses down the food chain Lynn Windows XP 3 06-26-2007 02:36 PM
Finally! Glass film holders for the 8000/9000 at B&H are "in stock" Alan Browne Scanners 0 05-01-2007 02:26 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
© 2004 - 2007 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd. Usenet and forums posts © their respective authors.
Ad Management by RedTyger