Re: Epson 3800 Maintenance cartridge status -clarification
me@mine.net wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:35:44 -0400, in comp.periphs.printers Alan
> Browne <alan.browne@Freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote:
>> I was asking about the computer display of the printer status, not theon
>> machine display. Neither the on machine display, nor the "fine manual"
>> explain what the percentages mean.
>
>
> P.97 has a graphic of the on machine display showing nearly full bars
> for the ink cartridges and a completely full one for the maintenance
> cartridge and the caption "Maintenance cartridge indicator (showing a
> new cartridge)."
>
> If that doesn't explicitly provide the information you originally
> asked for, I don't know what does. It would not be a leap of faith to
> assume that the driver display used the same weighting scale and it
> would then be a trivial exercise to compare the two to verify. If this
> is beyond your comprehension or abilities we can't help with that.
You make assumptions about why I asked the question in the first place.
Re: Epson 3800 Maintenance cartridge status -clarification
In article <gc03ka$ivc$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
TJ <TJ@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Stuart wrote:
> >
> > Another standard of usenet is known as snipping, (No, not sniping, there
> > is too much of that as it is) as I have done with this post. In most
> > cases, when replying to a post there is no need to quote the entire post
> > as the other person knows what he said.
> >
> Apparently you didn't read my entire post, or you ignored the paragraph
> you snipped away.
Yes I did notice your mention of the delete key
I was using your post to make a point too.
> I was making a point. People seem to have much more of
> a snit over those who top-post than those who are too lazy to snip a
> quote. I find the lack of snipping MUCH more annoying than top-posting.