250 gm ve 285 gm paper

I have been using Kodak ultra glossy 285 gm paper and would like to
know if there is a quality difference as well a gloss difference
between the above and the 240 gm glossy paper. I have read only bad
things about Kodak paper, but for cost reasons it is either Kodak or
not printing anything. I only buy the photo paper when it is on
special.

Thanks
Mike

MikeM wrote:
> I have been using Kodak ultra glossy 285 gm paper and would like to
> know if there is a quality difference as well a gloss difference
> between the above and the 240 gm glossy paper. I have read only bad
> things about Kodak paper, but for cost reasons it is either Kodak or
> not printing anything. I only buy the photo paper when it is on
> special.
>
> Thanks
> Mike

Don't use photo quality as I have found it doesn't absorb the ink. Its
cheap tho.

MikeM wrote:
> I have been using Kodak ultra glossy 285 gm paper and would like to
> know if there is a quality difference as well a gloss difference
> between the above and the 240 gm glossy paper. I have read only bad
> things about Kodak paper,
I was informed by a Canon representative that Kodak paper does not
produce good results using Canon printers.
> but for cost reasons it is either Kodak or
> not printing anything. I only buy the photo paper when it is on
> special.
>
> Thanks
> Mike
>