6320 OC?

Has anyone here tried ocing a 6320? I was going to get a 4300 or 4400 but
it looks like only the early runs were good overclockers? The 6320 is only
like $30 more than the 4400.

bob

"Billy Bob" <me@getlost.com> wrote in message
news:C-udnYfZ1b1xrczbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Has anyone here tried ocing a 6320? I was going to get a 4300 or 4400 but
> it looks like only the early runs were good overclockers? The 6320 is
> only like $30 more than the 4400.
>
> bob

It still hits 2.7ghz on stock settings which is not bad for a $ 130 chip...
overclocking the E6320 requires faster memory which costs more.

"Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:4651950b$0$18537$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere .com...
> "Billy Bob" <me@getlost.com> wrote in message
> news:C-udnYfZ1b1xrczbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Has anyone here tried ocing a 6320? I was going to get a 4300 or 4400
>> but it looks like only the early runs were good overclockers? The 6320
>> is only like $30 more than the 4400.
>>
>> bob
>
> It still hits 2.7ghz on stock settings which is not bad for a $ 130
> chip... overclocking the E6320 requires faster memory which costs more.

I'll be getting the gskil 2 gig ddr2 800 memory, if that helps?

thx

bob

"Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:4651950b$0$18537$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere .com...
> "Billy Bob" <me@getlost.com> wrote in message
> news:C-udnYfZ1b1xrczbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Has anyone here tried ocing a 6320? I was going to get a 4300 or 4400
>> but it looks like only the early runs were good overclockers? The 6320
>> is only like $30 more than the 4400.
>>
>> bob
>
> It still hits 2.7ghz on stock settings which is not bad for a $ 130
> chip... overclocking the E6320 requires faster memory which costs more.


Are you referring to the E6320 for $130?


thx

bob
>

"Billy Bob" <me@getlost.com> wrote in message
news:282dncQ5Xc_TOczbnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
> "Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4651950b$0$18537$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere .com...
>> "Billy Bob" <me@getlost.com> wrote in message
>> news:C-udnYfZ1b1xrczbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Has anyone here tried ocing a 6320? I was going to get a 4300 or 4400
>>> but it looks like only the early runs were good overclockers? The 6320
>>> is only like $30 more than the 4400.
>>>
>>> bob
>>
>> It still hits 2.7ghz on stock settings which is not bad for a $ 130
>> chip... overclocking the E6320 requires faster memory which costs more.
>
>
> Are you referring to the E6320 for $130?
>

No the E4300 which is approx $130 isn't it? I dunno becuase I live in the UK
and it costs £ 62 here (the E4300 that is) the E6320 costs £ 88. Your
getting the faster RAM so you should be able to take the E6320 higher then
the 2331mhz it will reach at 333x7 - how high I dunno. You'd have to reach
385x7 to get it to 2700mhz so that will require the ddr800 I guess although
I heard that some ddr667 will reach 800 speeds. Don't take anything for
granted even 2700mhz is a nice overclock for a CPU that starts out at
1800mhz and only costs $ 120 how much further you will be able to get with a
more expensive e6320 and more expensive RAM I dunno but is it really worth
that much more?

Actually the ram is $85 US for 2 gig right now!


bob



"Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:4651a993$0$18536$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere .com...
> "Billy Bob" <me@getlost.com> wrote in message
> news:282dncQ5Xc_TOczbnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>>
>> "Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:4651950b$0$18537$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere .com...
>>> "Billy Bob" <me@getlost.com> wrote in message
>>> news:C-udnYfZ1b1xrczbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Has anyone here tried ocing a 6320? I was going to get a 4300 or 4400
>>>> but it looks like only the early runs were good overclockers? The 6320
>>>> is only like $30 more than the 4400.
>>>>
>>>> bob
>>>
>>> It still hits 2.7ghz on stock settings which is not bad for a $ 130
>>> chip... overclocking the E6320 requires faster memory which costs more.
>>
>>
>> Are you referring to the E6320 for $130?
>>
>
> No the E4300 which is approx $130 isn't it? I dunno becuase I live in the
> UK and it costs £ 62 here (the E4300 that is) the E6320 costs £ 88. Your
> getting the faster RAM so you should be able to take the E6320 higher then
> the 2331mhz it will reach at 333x7 - how high I dunno. You'd have to reach
> 385x7 to get it to 2700mhz so that will require the ddr800 I guess
> although I heard that some ddr667 will reach 800 speeds. Don't take
> anything for granted even 2700mhz is a nice overclock for a CPU that
> starts out at 1800mhz and only costs $ 120 how much further you will be
> able to get with a more expensive e6320 and more expensive RAM I dunno but
> is it really worth that much more?