I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do change
from Blue web page.
The Help button is (sadly) a tiny, blue-on-blue question mark in the upper
right of the applications. You can also use F1 on the keyboard to access
help in just about any Microsoft application.
In Help, there are several topics on Accessibility, both in Windows and in
the applications themselves. The information on the specific applications
mostly talks about how to use different input (keyboard versus mouse).
This page might help you get more information on what options can be set:
There are links to accessibility features in Office 2007 and Windows on the
right-hand side of the page.
Hope that helps.
--
--
Susan Ramlet
MVP - Office
Please reply to the newsgroup. I cannot respond to private requests for
help. Besides, then the community doesn't benefit from your question!
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
>disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do
>change from Blue web page.
>
> Can anyone help please
>
> Thanks
>
> Ken
>
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
>disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do
>change from Blue web page.
>
> Can anyone help please
>
> Thanks
>
> Ken
>
the overall resolution of the monitor
can be changed as well.
it you go to the "display control panel"
then under the settings tab you can
increase the entire viewing area by
selecting a "lower screen resolution".
the mouse can also be altered in
a beneficial manner as well via
the mouse control panel and selecting
a different mouse scheme
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do change
from Blue web page.
Of course, this is a bad suggestion for someone on a laptop or using an LCD
monitor on their desktop. LCD screens are best viewed at its native
resolution. If those resolutions are not used the monitor will become
distorted and in some cases unreadable.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uQl1XASpHHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
in addition to the other suggestions:
the overall resolution of the monitor
can be changed as well.
it you go to the "display control panel"
then under the settings tab you can
increase the entire viewing area by
selecting a "lower screen resolution".
the mouse can also be altered in
a beneficial manner as well via
the mouse control panel and selecting
a different mouse scheme
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do change
from Blue web page.
native is another word for
default. fortunately, windows
is about having the options
to customize.
if your rationale was valid,
then features like the windows
magnifier would be a
problem as you believe.
additionally, your rationale
doesn't work for high end
video boards with an
array of features that can
be used by desktops with
lcd or standard monitors.
fortunately and unlike yourself,
i am confident that the o.p.
recognizes distortions
and won't sit at a monitor looking
at a unreadiable display simply
because i made a suggestion
to use a windows feature that
provides the o.p. with a small
amount of time to view the new
resolution and keep it or revert back.
the suggestions i provided
are reasonable and within
the functionality of windows and
windows ready hardware.
but in fairness, the problem you
mention may be a result of not
having enough resources reserved
for video/display. but this is likely
an issue with configuration.
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message news:O9Zl1%23hpHHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Of course, this is a bad suggestion for someone on a laptop or using an LCD
monitor on their desktop. LCD screens are best viewed at its native
resolution. If those resolutions are not used the monitor will become
distorted and in some cases unreadable.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uQl1XASpHHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
in addition to the other suggestions:
the overall resolution of the monitor
can be changed as well.
it you go to the "display control panel"
then under the settings tab you can
increase the entire viewing area by
selecting a "lower screen resolution".
the mouse can also be altered in
a beneficial manner as well via
the mouse control panel and selecting
a different mouse scheme
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do change
from Blue web page.
Native is not the same as default. Native in this respect is what is
designed into a piece of hardware, that in this case may be changed, but
normally is not the desired functionality. Default is what the operator
sets in a device that the computer uses each time but it may reduce
functionality. The monitor manufacturer creates a native resolution of a
LCD monitor but the user sets the default resolution sent to the monitor by
using the video adapter. Yes, Windows is about customization but sometimes
the customization that is available in Windows doesn't give the results that
are desired.
Windows magnifier is NOT the same as changing the resolution of the monitor.
It still puts the "enlarged" image on the screen at the adapter specified
resolution but you lose part of the screen.
While CRT displays can be adjusted to the user's preference in resolution
settings, LCDs only look good and operate properly in their native
resolution. This is the "sweet spot" of the LCD - the resolution it was
meant to be used at.
And this is where most LCD owners, especially those that purchase new
laptops, have the most issues with their displays. The problem is that the
higher the native resolution of an LCD more information can fit on the
screen, making text and graphics appear smaller. This is the converse of
what many laptop buyers want - most think that buying a larger screen with a
higher resolution will allow them to see their desktop as larger. This,
however, is not the case. A higher resolution means that there are more
pixels per inch, making everything smaller, but giving the desktop more
room."
From Dell's web site about half way down entitled "Choosing an LCD
Resolution"
"While the overall appearance of documents and photos is greatly improved as
the ppi increases, fonts, icons, and graphic elements that make up the user
interface become smaller. Text that is readable on a 15-inch XGA panel can
be more difficult to read on a 15-inch UXGA panel. When faced with this
issue on a UXGA panel, a user's first instinct is to enlarge the text by
changing the resolution from UXGA to a lower resolution such as XGA.
However, lowering the resolution of a UXGA panel reduces the crispness and
clarity of displayed text. This is because each LCD has an optimal "native
resolution" and LCDs do not scale between resolutions as cleanly as CRTs."
So, in other words, it isn't the driving hardware, video adapter or its
settings, but the receiving hardware, the monitor, in this case that can't
be changed cleanly, just as my original post stated.
You have given proper advice for a person for a person with a CRT monitor
but definitely improper advice for someone with a laptop or LCD monitor.
Had you read the OPs post you would have read that the OP "due to poor
eyesight" may not recognize that the monitor is actually distorted at a
non-native resolution.
One other thing, most people post in newsgroups in plain text not in HTML as
you are doing. There are newsreaders out there that won't read the HTML
that you are posting. When a responder clicks on "reply group" the HTML is
carried over to the replier's post and needs to be changed to plain text.
Yes, it is a feature of Windows to be able to post with OE in HTML to a
newsgroup but it isn't the proper thing to do.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23rjqUuipHHA.3948@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
native is another word for
default. fortunately, windows
is about having the options
to customize.
if your rationale was valid,
then features like the windows
magnifier would be a
problem as you believe.
additionally, your rationale
doesn't work for high end
video boards with an
array of features that can
be used by desktops with
lcd or standard monitors.
fortunately and unlike yourself,
i am confident that the o.p.
recognizes distortions
and won't sit at a monitor looking
at a unreadiable display simply
because i made a suggestion
to use a windows feature that
provides the o.p. with a small
amount of time to view the new
resolution and keep it or revert back.
the suggestions i provided
are reasonable and within
the functionality of windows and
windows ready hardware.
but in fairness, the problem you
mention may be a result of not
having enough resources reserved
for video/display. but this is likely
an issue with configuration.
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:O9Zl1%23hpHHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Of course, this is a bad suggestion for someone on a laptop or using an LCD
monitor on their desktop. LCD screens are best viewed at its native
resolution. If those resolutions are not used the monitor will become
distorted and in some cases unreadable.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uQl1XASpHHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
in addition to the other suggestions:
the overall resolution of the monitor
can be changed as well.
it you go to the "display control panel"
then under the settings tab you can
increase the entire viewing area by
selecting a "lower screen resolution".
the mouse can also be altered in
a beneficial manner as well via
the mouse control panel and selecting
a different mouse scheme
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do change
from Blue web page.
further, if the o.p. is not happy with the
results of a different resolution
then the o.p. can select
whatever works best. my suggestion
is just that "a suggestion".
i don't appreciate wasting any time
reading your overstated verbiage
on this matter. however, what i have
read it is obvious that you think
the o.p. is somekind of an idiot and
you think that i / we don't know your
personality type.
however, i would suggest to you
that since you feel
so strongly about this issue,
send your hard work and research to
the microsoft programmers.
that way they can rewrite their
billion dollar software and remove
the custom resolution feature.
in conclusion if you have a
better suggestion then provide
one to the o.p, however, it is because
we understand your personality type that
the other readers know if you had a better
suggestion then you would have provided
one; even if it meant reiterating and
supporting another responders.
otherwise your argument with me is petty
and over compensating for an otherwise
simplistic question by the o.p..
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message news:OB4m50spHHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
Native is not the same as default. Native in this respect is what is
designed into a piece of hardware, that in this case may be changed, but
normally is not the desired functionality. Default is what the operator
sets in a device that the computer uses each time but it may reduce
functionality. The monitor manufacturer creates a native resolution of a
LCD monitor but the user sets the default resolution sent to the monitor by
using the video adapter. Yes, Windows is about customization but sometimes
the customization that is available in Windows doesn't give the results that
are desired.
Windows magnifier is NOT the same as changing the resolution of the monitor.
It still puts the "enlarged" image on the screen at the adapter specified
resolution but you lose part of the screen.
While CRT displays can be adjusted to the user's preference in resolution
settings, LCDs only look good and operate properly in their native
resolution. This is the "sweet spot" of the LCD - the resolution it was
meant to be used at.
And this is where most LCD owners, especially those that purchase new
laptops, have the most issues with their displays. The problem is that the
higher the native resolution of an LCD more information can fit on the
screen, making text and graphics appear smaller. This is the converse of
what many laptop buyers want - most think that buying a larger screen with a
higher resolution will allow them to see their desktop as larger. This,
however, is not the case. A higher resolution means that there are more
pixels per inch, making everything smaller, but giving the desktop more
room."
From Dell's web site about half way down entitled "Choosing an LCD
Resolution"
"While the overall appearance of documents and photos is greatly improved as
the ppi increases, fonts, icons, and graphic elements that make up the user
interface become smaller. Text that is readable on a 15-inch XGA panel can
be more difficult to read on a 15-inch UXGA panel. When faced with this
issue on a UXGA panel, a user's first instinct is to enlarge the text by
changing the resolution from UXGA to a lower resolution such as XGA.
However, lowering the resolution of a UXGA panel reduces the crispness and
clarity of displayed text. This is because each LCD has an optimal "native
resolution" and LCDs do not scale between resolutions as cleanly as CRTs."
So, in other words, it isn't the driving hardware, video adapter or its
settings, but the receiving hardware, the monitor, in this case that can't
be changed cleanly, just as my original post stated.
You have given proper advice for a person for a person with a CRT monitor
but definitely improper advice for someone with a laptop or LCD monitor.
Had you read the OPs post you would have read that the OP "due to poor
eyesight" may not recognize that the monitor is actually distorted at a
non-native resolution.
One other thing, most people post in newsgroups in plain text not in HTML as
you are doing. There are newsreaders out there that won't read the HTML
that you are posting. When a responder clicks on "reply group" the HTML is
carried over to the replier's post and needs to be changed to plain text.
Yes, it is a feature of Windows to be able to post with OE in HTML to a
newsgroup but it isn't the proper thing to do.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23rjqUuipHHA.3948@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
native is another word for
default. fortunately, windows
is about having the options
to customize.
if your rationale was valid,
then features like the windows
magnifier would be a
problem as you believe.
additionally, your rationale
doesn't work for high end
video boards with an
array of features that can
be used by desktops with
lcd or standard monitors.
fortunately and unlike yourself,
i am confident that the o.p.
recognizes distortions
and won't sit at a monitor looking
at a unreadiable display simply
because i made a suggestion
to use a windows feature that
provides the o.p. with a small
amount of time to view the new
resolution and keep it or revert back.
the suggestions i provided
are reasonable and within
the functionality of windows and
windows ready hardware.
but in fairness, the problem you
mention may be a result of not
having enough resources reserved
for video/display. but this is likely
an issue with configuration.
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:O9Zl1%23hpHHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Of course, this is a bad suggestion for someone on a laptop or using an LCD
monitor on their desktop. LCD screens are best viewed at its native
resolution. If those resolutions are not used the monitor will become
distorted and in some cases unreadable.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uQl1XASpHHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
in addition to the other suggestions:
the overall resolution of the monitor
can be changed as well.
it you go to the "display control panel"
then under the settings tab you can
increase the entire viewing area by
selecting a "lower screen resolution".
the mouse can also be altered in
a beneficial manner as well via
the mouse control panel and selecting
a different mouse scheme
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do change
from Blue web page.
I am not the one being overly "verbiage" in this. I stated that your
suggestion was potentially wrong. Many posts to this and other newgroups
show people trying to clear up screens that are fuzzy because they changed
the resolution on their LCD display. The second post was to support my
original statements in response to your obvious incorrect suggestion,
depending on customer's equipment, that you defended in you second post.
While I don't know what you mean by "don't know your personality type" when
you said it other than I am someone trying to correct a potentially
incorrect statement made in a post. You, on the other hand take things too
personally. You have obviously not read my second post but that doesn't
matter. My position stands on the LCD resolution matter that I brought to
the attention of anyone reading the thread and I have posted supporting
documnents to that effect. I don't think anyone is an idiot until they
prove to me that they, in fact, are! If the shoe fits!
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uzfOybtpHHA.4212@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
the o.p.'s question
is simple.
further, if the o.p. is not happy with the
results of a different resolution
then the o.p. can select
whatever works best. my suggestion
is just that "a suggestion".
i don't appreciate wasting any time
reading your overstated verbiage
on this matter. however, what i have
read it is obvious that you think
the o.p. is somekind of an idiot and
you think that i / we don't know your
personality type.
however, i would suggest to you
that since you feel
so strongly about this issue,
send your hard work and research to
the microsoft programmers.
that way they can rewrite their
billion dollar software and remove
the custom resolution feature.
in conclusion if you have a
better suggestion then provide
one to the o.p, however, it is because
we understand your personality type that
the other readers know if you had a better
suggestion then you would have provided
one; even if it meant reiterating and
supporting another responders.
otherwise your argument with me is petty
and over compensating for an otherwise
simplistic question by the o.p..
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:OB4m50spHHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
Native is not the same as default. Native in this respect is what is
designed into a piece of hardware, that in this case may be changed, but
normally is not the desired functionality. Default is what the operator
sets in a device that the computer uses each time but it may reduce
functionality. The monitor manufacturer creates a native resolution of a
LCD monitor but the user sets the default resolution sent to the monitor by
using the video adapter. Yes, Windows is about customization but sometimes
the customization that is available in Windows doesn't give the results that
are desired.
Windows magnifier is NOT the same as changing the resolution of the monitor.
It still puts the "enlarged" image on the screen at the adapter specified
resolution but you lose part of the screen.
While CRT displays can be adjusted to the user's preference in resolution
settings, LCDs only look good and operate properly in their native
resolution. This is the "sweet spot" of the LCD - the resolution it was
meant to be used at.
And this is where most LCD owners, especially those that purchase new
laptops, have the most issues with their displays. The problem is that the
higher the native resolution of an LCD more information can fit on the
screen, making text and graphics appear smaller. This is the converse of
what many laptop buyers want - most think that buying a larger screen with a
higher resolution will allow them to see their desktop as larger. This,
however, is not the case. A higher resolution means that there are more
pixels per inch, making everything smaller, but giving the desktop more
room."
From Dell's web site about half way down entitled "Choosing an LCD
Resolution"
"While the overall appearance of documents and photos is greatly improved as
the ppi increases, fonts, icons, and graphic elements that make up the user
interface become smaller. Text that is readable on a 15-inch XGA panel can
be more difficult to read on a 15-inch UXGA panel. When faced with this
issue on a UXGA panel, a user's first instinct is to enlarge the text by
changing the resolution from UXGA to a lower resolution such as XGA.
However, lowering the resolution of a UXGA panel reduces the crispness and
clarity of displayed text. This is because each LCD has an optimal "native
resolution" and LCDs do not scale between resolutions as cleanly as CRTs."
So, in other words, it isn't the driving hardware, video adapter or its
settings, but the receiving hardware, the monitor, in this case that can't
be changed cleanly, just as my original post stated.
You have given proper advice for a person for a person with a CRT monitor
but definitely improper advice for someone with a laptop or LCD monitor.
Had you read the OPs post you would have read that the OP "due to poor
eyesight" may not recognize that the monitor is actually distorted at a
non-native resolution.
One other thing, most people post in newsgroups in plain text not in HTML as
you are doing. There are newsreaders out there that won't read the HTML
that you are posting. When a responder clicks on "reply group" the HTML is
carried over to the replier's post and needs to be changed to plain text.
Yes, it is a feature of Windows to be able to post with OE in HTML to a
newsgroup but it isn't the proper thing to do.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23rjqUuipHHA.3948@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
native is another word for
default. fortunately, windows
is about having the options
to customize.
if your rationale was valid,
then features like the windows
magnifier would be a
problem as you believe.
additionally, your rationale
doesn't work for high end
video boards with an
array of features that can
be used by desktops with
lcd or standard monitors.
fortunately and unlike yourself,
i am confident that the o.p.
recognizes distortions
and won't sit at a monitor looking
at a unreadiable display simply
because i made a suggestion
to use a windows feature that
provides the o.p. with a small
amount of time to view the new
resolution and keep it or revert back.
the suggestions i provided
are reasonable and within
the functionality of windows and
windows ready hardware.
but in fairness, the problem you
mention may be a result of not
having enough resources reserved
for video/display. but this is likely
an issue with configuration.
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:O9Zl1%23hpHHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Of course, this is a bad suggestion for someone on a laptop or using an LCD
monitor on their desktop. LCD screens are best viewed at its native
resolution. If those resolutions are not used the monitor will become
distorted and in some cases unreadable.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uQl1XASpHHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
in addition to the other suggestions:
the overall resolution of the monitor
can be changed as well.
it you go to the "display control panel"
then under the settings tab you can
increase the entire viewing area by
selecting a "lower screen resolution".
the mouse can also be altered in
a beneficial manner as well via
the mouse control panel and selecting
a different mouse scheme
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do change
from Blue web page.
Not in the mood to split hairs. However
your actual words are:
"Of course, this is a bad suggestion for someone...."
---------
Frankly, describing me as testy is
not the word I would use. Annoyed
is a better one and disappointment is
another.
I am disappointed that you would rather spend a
great deal of time and my time
to create a big issue for something that is
elementary and otherwise mediocre.
I hope you don't think of this as another
"bad suggestion", however maybe you
should spend your time towards a tangible
solution and pursuant to the original
question rather than arguments and insults.
It is my hope you understand
that i didn't spend any time reading
your extended remarks and position because
my suggestion is based on
the options provided by Microsoft:
Sincerely, it is my hope that people may find
some value with your research on this
issue for many years to come and maybe
as a possible cure for insomnia.....
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uMHXguupHHA.1220@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
My, my, testy aren't we!
I am not the one being overly "verbiage" in this. I stated that your
suggestion was potentially wrong. Many posts to this and other newgroups
show people trying to clear up screens that are fuzzy because they changed
the resolution on their LCD display. The second post was to support my
original statements in response to your obvious incorrect suggestion,
depending on customer's equipment, that you defended in you second post.
While I don't know what you mean by "don't know your personality type" when
you said it other than I am someone trying to correct a potentially
incorrect statement made in a post. You, on the other hand take things too
personally. You have obviously not read my second post but that doesn't
matter. My position stands on the LCD resolution matter that I brought to
the attention of anyone reading the thread and I have posted supporting
documnents to that effect. I don't think anyone is an idiot until they
prove to me that they, in fact, are! If the shoe fits!
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uzfOybtpHHA.4212@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
the o.p.'s question
is simple.
further, if the o.p. is not happy with the
results of a different resolution
then the o.p. can select
whatever works best. my suggestion
is just that "a suggestion".
i don't appreciate wasting any time
reading your overstated verbiage
on this matter. however, what i have
read it is obvious that you think
the o.p. is somekind of an idiot and
you think that i / we don't know your
personality type.
however, i would suggest to you
that since you feel
so strongly about this issue,
send your hard work and research to
the microsoft programmers.
that way they can rewrite their
billion dollar software and remove
the custom resolution feature.
in conclusion if you have a
better suggestion then provide
one to the o.p, however, it is because
we understand your personality type that
the other readers know if you had a better
suggestion then you would have provided
one; even if it meant reiterating and
supporting another responders.
otherwise your argument with me is petty
and over compensating for an otherwise
simplistic question by the o.p..
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:OB4m50spHHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
Native is not the same as default. Native in this respect is what is
designed into a piece of hardware, that in this case may be changed, but
normally is not the desired functionality. Default is what the operator
sets in a device that the computer uses each time but it may reduce
functionality. The monitor manufacturer creates a native resolution of a
LCD monitor but the user sets the default resolution sent to the monitor by
using the video adapter. Yes, Windows is about customization but sometimes
the customization that is available in Windows doesn't give the results that
are desired.
Windows magnifier is NOT the same as changing the resolution of the monitor.
It still puts the "enlarged" image on the screen at the adapter specified
resolution but you lose part of the screen.
While CRT displays can be adjusted to the user's preference in resolution
settings, LCDs only look good and operate properly in their native
resolution. This is the "sweet spot" of the LCD - the resolution it was
meant to be used at.
And this is where most LCD owners, especially those that purchase new
laptops, have the most issues with their displays. The problem is that the
higher the native resolution of an LCD more information can fit on the
screen, making text and graphics appear smaller. This is the converse of
what many laptop buyers want - most think that buying a larger screen with a
higher resolution will allow them to see their desktop as larger. This,
however, is not the case. A higher resolution means that there are more
pixels per inch, making everything smaller, but giving the desktop more
room."
From Dell's web site about half way down entitled "Choosing an LCD
Resolution"
"While the overall appearance of documents and photos is greatly improved as
the ppi increases, fonts, icons, and graphic elements that make up the user
interface become smaller. Text that is readable on a 15-inch XGA panel can
be more difficult to read on a 15-inch UXGA panel. When faced with this
issue on a UXGA panel, a user's first instinct is to enlarge the text by
changing the resolution from UXGA to a lower resolution such as XGA.
However, lowering the resolution of a UXGA panel reduces the crispness and
clarity of displayed text. This is because each LCD has an optimal "native
resolution" and LCDs do not scale between resolutions as cleanly as CRTs."
So, in other words, it isn't the driving hardware, video adapter or its
settings, but the receiving hardware, the monitor, in this case that can't
be changed cleanly, just as my original post stated.
You have given proper advice for a person for a person with a CRT monitor
but definitely improper advice for someone with a laptop or LCD monitor.
Had you read the OPs post you would have read that the OP "due to poor
eyesight" may not recognize that the monitor is actually distorted at a
non-native resolution.
One other thing, most people post in newsgroups in plain text not in HTML as
you are doing. There are newsreaders out there that won't read the HTML
that you are posting. When a responder clicks on "reply group" the HTML is
carried over to the replier's post and needs to be changed to plain text.
Yes, it is a feature of Windows to be able to post with OE in HTML to a
newsgroup but it isn't the proper thing to do.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23rjqUuipHHA.3948@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
native is another word for
default. fortunately, windows
is about having the options
to customize.
if your rationale was valid,
then features like the windows
magnifier would be a
problem as you believe.
additionally, your rationale
doesn't work for high end
video boards with an
array of features that can
be used by desktops with
lcd or standard monitors.
fortunately and unlike yourself,
i am confident that the o.p.
recognizes distortions
and won't sit at a monitor looking
at a unreadiable display simply
because i made a suggestion
to use a windows feature that
provides the o.p. with a small
amount of time to view the new
resolution and keep it or revert back.
the suggestions i provided
are reasonable and within
the functionality of windows and
windows ready hardware.
but in fairness, the problem you
mention may be a result of not
having enough resources reserved
for video/display. but this is likely
an issue with configuration.
"LVTravel" <noone@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:O9Zl1%23hpHHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Of course, this is a bad suggestion for someone on a laptop or using an LCD
monitor on their desktop. LCD screens are best viewed at its native
resolution. If those resolutions are not used the monitor will become
distorted and in some cases unreadable.
"db" <databaseben.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uQl1XASpHHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
in addition to the other suggestions:
the overall resolution of the monitor
can be changed as well.
it you go to the "display control panel"
then under the settings tab you can
increase the entire viewing area by
selecting a "lower screen resolution".
the mouse can also be altered in
a beneficial manner as well via
the mouse control panel and selecting
a different mouse scheme
"Ken" <suttoncoastguard@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23ux$EpPpHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
I have just updated to MS Office 2007 and due to poor eyesight and also
disabbled I am having trouble finding the Help button and also how do change
from Blue web page.
Office 3007 
Linear Mode
