VT Shooting

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:28:12 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote:

>> BTW, it should be patently clear to you, me and the rest of the
>> planet that other than with a few "stopped clock" coincidences,
>> we're not likely to convince each other of very much or agree on
>> very much, so maybe we should devote more energy to other, more
>> fruitful and on-topic-al topics?
>
> OK with me. We've probably both made our positions and opinions plain
> enough, and they are unlikely to become any plainer with further discussion.
>
> But I've enjoyed it while it lasted, and I hope you have too. :-)

Enjoyed? I suppose. More like the enjoyment one can get from
exercise, but I wouldn't compare it to the enjoyment you can get
from good music, a good book, film, food, photography, children,
pets or getting a chance to kick Nixon around one more time. <g>

"George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:C25BE94C.234E2%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
[ . . . ]
>>
> Neil, God bless ya, but you are arguing with an mind-numbed zombie idiot.
>
> Good luck!

Thank you, George.

Neil

[Dean Speir]

ASAAR: They were also called "cop killer bullets" by many people….

No, they were not… I was there, I covered the story, and I don't know where you were at that time, but you've got it wrong. Not even that old gin sot Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D, NY) called them that, and he was out in front on that issue, reasoning with unassailable logic that guns don't kill people, bullets do.

ASAAR: The outlawing of dum dum bullets by the military is exactly what I was referring to.

And you would be incorrect there as well: see The Gun Zone -- Hague Convention .

Excuse the "necro-posting," but I can't abide an uncorrected record.

(Don't anyone here ever trim their quoted responses?)

- Dean Speir