Shelly F wrote:
> Would someone please tell me what the AMD equivalent to the Intel 6600
> (2.4GHz clock speed)......is it AMD 6000+, as an example ?
>
> HOw about the Intel 6420 and the 6700? (2.13 and 2.66 GHz clock speed,
> respectfully)?
>
> tia
C2D 6600 looks pretty close to AMD 6000+ here. Each processor has its
plusses and minuses. These charts take a lot of interpretation, so
glancing at them once is not enough.
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 01:22:50 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.com> wrote:
>One thing I still don't understand, is whether the C2D really has lousy
>FP performance or not.
Interesting issue. I think AMD has had the better math unit for
quite some time. Intel builds it's processors to run benchmarks and
do all that media encoding.
Without a die shrink advantage, 4meg cache, benchmark prefetchers,
friendly software compilers, and whatnot, the C2D might not be all
that, but them's the breaks. C2D's got them and it works.