uri wrote:
> On Feb 24, 4:28 pm, John McGaw <nob...@nowh.ere> wrote:
>
>> Or look at the March 2008 issue of Scientific American in which an
>> article debunks some of the wilder claims made for quantum computers.
>
> The problem is that the scientific american article is not free.
Never claimed that it was free, just that it existed. It is lying on my
nightstand right now. If you really want free you can probably go down
to your local purveyor of periodicals and read the article while walking
around casually pretending to browse.
On Feb 24, 7:25 pm, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Neither are most things in life.
>
> Isn't that a *****?
It is a *****. Most knowledge isn't free but there are several
altruistic projects like wikipedia or the free information society
which provides knowledge for free.
In sci.physics uri <danny99@bezeqint.net> wrote:
> On Feb 24, 7:25 pm, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > Neither are most things in life.
> >
> > Isn't that a *****?
> It is a *****. Most knowledge isn't free but there are several
> altruistic projects like wikipedia or the free information society
> which provides knowledge for free.
On Feb 24, 12:06*pm, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
> On Feb 24, 4:28 pm, John McGaw <nob...@nowh.ere> wrote:
>
> > Or look at the March 2008 issue of Scientific American in which an
> > article debunks some of the wilder claims made for quantum computers.
>
> The problem is that the scientific american article is not free.
Uri, no real scientific informatin is ever cost free. Real testbooks
are expensive, and good luck with whatever you find for free on the
Internet.
Ask yourself this question: How does one construct an 'quantum
computer'? What precisely is the technology employed to construct one?
Quantum computers 
Linear Mode
