Cessna 310 wrote:
>
> This has probably been discussed before, but...
>
> I'm a little at a loss to figure out how DDR2800 CAS 5 is going to
> perform better than DDR400 CAS 2.5.
>
> Any explanations would be appreciated.
>
> TIA
>
>
Higher bandwidth.
Latency is the same, sort of (as the protocol is not exactly the same
for the two technologies).
According to an update blurb in this article, "posted CAS and
additive latency" are not being used by desktop chipset makers.
So I guess for the motherboards we use, the Xbitlabs comparison
numbers should be a good fit.