HTFC Forums

H.T.F.C.

How To Fix Computers





Go Back   HTFC Forums > Hardware Newsgroups > Brand-name systems > Gateway

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1  
Old 08-14-2009, 04:09 AM
Larry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Harddrive install question : size?

Insatalled a 160gb wd in a gateway MX6440 laptop and all i see is 149gb
totel size with 145gb free. how do i get the full drive?
Thanks Larry
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Fix your Windows Problems - FAST.
FREE Safe Scan Registry Check. Locate & Fix Errors in Minutes!
  #2  
Old 08-14-2009, 04:26 AM
Larry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Harddrive install question : size?

Larry <Larry@nospamme.net> wrote in news:Xns9C66CD1603C99Larrynospammenet@
216.196.97.130:

> Insatalled a 160gb wd in a gateway MX6440 laptop and all i see is 149gb
> totel size with 145gb free. how do i get the full drive?
> Thanks Larry
>


I checked local disk properties . It sees 160 gb then to the right 144.
Free space 155gb to the right 144gb. Don't know whats happened.
Thanks Larry

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2009, 05:52 AM
Ben Myers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Harddrive install question : size?

Larry wrote:
> Insatalled a 160gb wd in a gateway MX6440 laptop and all i see is 149gb
> totel size with 145gb free. how do i get the full drive?
> Thanks Larry


It all depends on how you do the math. But no matter what, 1K does not
equal 1000. But then there's Microsoft math, a leftover from the days
when assembly programmers would save some clock cycles by avoiding a
time-consuming divide by 1000. Instead, they shifted the number right
10 bits (or dropping the rightmost 10 bits, if you'd rather)... Ben Myers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2009, 06:12 AM
Larry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Harddrive install question : size?

Ben Myers <ben_myers@charter.net> wrote in
news:h62r1n$bq3$2@news.eternal-september.org:

> Larry wrote:
>> Insatalled a 160gb wd in a gateway MX6440 laptop and all i see is
>> 149gb totel size with 145gb free. how do i get the full drive?
>> Thanks Larry

>
> It all depends on how you do the math. But no matter what, 1K does
> not equal 1000. But then there's Microsoft math, a leftover from the
> days when assembly programmers would save some clock cycles by
> avoiding a time-consuming divide by 1000. Instead, they shifted the
> number right 10 bits (or dropping the rightmost 10 bits, if you'd
> rather)... Ben Myers
>


Thanks Ben ! So 149 is the full size!. It would help if they just used
real numbers. You see 160 but it's a illusion.
Thanks Larry
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2009, 07:32 AM
Ken Whiton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Harddrive install question : size?

*-* On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, at 00:12:36 -0500,
*-* In Article <Xns9C66E1EE2B9FDLarrynospammenet@216.196.97.130 >,
*-* Larry wrote
*-* About Re: Harddrive install question : size?

> Ben Myers <ben_myers@charter.net> wrote in
> news:h62r1n$bq3$2@news.eternal-september.org:


>> Larry wrote:
>>> Insatalled a 160gb wd in a gateway MX6440 laptop and all i see is
>>> 149gb totel size with 145gb free. how do i get the full drive?
>>> Thanks Larry


>> It all depends on how you do the math. But no matter what, 1K does
>> not equal 1000. But then there's Microsoft math, a leftover from
>> the days when assembly programmers would save some clock cycles by
>> avoiding a time-consuming divide by 1000. Instead, they shifted
>> the number right 10 bits (or dropping the rightmost 10 bits, if
>> you'd rather)... Ben Myers


> Thanks Ben ! So 149 is the full size!. It would help if they just
> used real numbers. You see 160 but it's a illusion.


I wouldn't call it an illusion. It's the difference between
decimal (powers of 10 - 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, etc.) and binary
(powers of 2 - 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, etc.) math. In decimal math,
kilo- is 1,000. In binary math the closest power of 2 is 1,024, so
that came to be known as kilo- as the closest approximation.
Unfortunately, as you go up the scale, the difference becomes much
greater.

Decimal Binary

KiloByte (KB) 1,000 Bytes 1,024 Bytes
MegaByte (MB) 1,000,000 " 1,048,576 "
GigaByte (GB) 1,000,000,000 " 1,073,741,824 "

Hard drive manufacturers use decimal numbers to measure the
capacity of drives, so your 160 GB drive is 160,000,000,000 bytes.
Computers are binary devices (1/0, +/-, yes/no, however you want to
think of the process), so they "see" hard drives in binary terms, so
your computer sees that "160 GB" drive as
160,000,000,000/1,073,741,824 (or 149.0116) GB. The same relationship
applies to all hard drives (and other storage devices) whether OEM,
replacement, or whatever. As you can see from this example,
manufacturers measure capacity decimally because it allows them to
claim a larger capacity for a given size drive, and years ago, when
the practice started, the differences weren't as significant.

> Thanks Larry


You're welcome.

Ken Whiton
--
FIDO: 1:132/152
InterNet: kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL (remove the obvious to reply)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2009, 12:55 PM
BillW50
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Harddrive install question : size?

In news:h630e901pb4@enews2.newsguy.com,
Ken Whiton typed on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:32:42 -0400:
> I wouldn't call it an illusion. It's the difference between
> decimal (powers of 10 - 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, etc.) and binary
> (powers of 2 - 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, etc.) math. In decimal math,
> kilo- is 1,000. In binary math the closest power of 2 is 1,024, so
> that came to be known as kilo- as the closest approximation.
> Unfortunately, as you go up the scale, the difference becomes much
> greater.
>
> Decimal Binary
>
> KiloByte (KB) 1,000 Bytes 1,024 Bytes
> MegaByte (MB) 1,000,000 " 1,048,576 "
> GigaByte (GB) 1,000,000,000 " 1,073,741,824 "
>
> Hard drive manufacturers use decimal numbers to measure the
> capacity of drives, so your 160 GB drive is 160,000,000,000 bytes.
> Computers are binary devices (1/0, +/-, yes/no, however you want to
> think of the process), so they "see" hard drives in binary terms, so
> your computer sees that "160 GB" drive as
> 160,000,000,000/1,073,741,824 (or 149.0116) GB. The same relationship
> applies to all hard drives (and other storage devices) whether OEM,
> replacement, or whatever. As you can see from this example,
> manufacturers measure capacity decimally because it allows them to
> claim a larger capacity for a given size drive, and years ago, when
> the practice started, the differences weren't as significant.
>
>> Thanks Larry

>
> You're welcome.
>
> Ken Whiton


Also to add, don't forget the drive compacity is measured before
formatting. Like McDonald's Quarter Pounder is a quarter pound before
cooking. After formatting, you lose some of the free space as well.

--
Bill
Gateway MX6124 ('06 era) - Windows XP SP2


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2009, 03:03 PM
Ben Myers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Harddrive install question : size?

Larry wrote:
> Ben Myers <ben_myers@charter.net> wrote in
> news:h62r1n$bq3$2@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> Larry wrote:
>>> Insatalled a 160gb wd in a gateway MX6440 laptop and all i see is
>>> 149gb totel size with 145gb free. how do i get the full drive?
>>> Thanks Larry

>> It all depends on how you do the math. But no matter what, 1K does
>> not equal 1000. But then there's Microsoft math, a leftover from the
>> days when assembly programmers would save some clock cycles by
>> avoiding a time-consuming divide by 1000. Instead, they shifted the
>> number right 10 bits (or dropping the rightmost 10 bits, if you'd
>> rather)... Ben Myers
>>

>
> Thanks Ben ! So 149 is the full size!. It would help if they just used
> real numbers. You see 160 but it's a illusion.
> Thanks Larry


If you right click the drive letter in My Computer, and then click on
Properties, you'll get to see both numbers. The honest to gosh real
base 10 decimal number followed by the mangled-by-1K number... Ben Myers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2009, 03:07 PM
Ben Myers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Harddrive install question : size?

BillW50 wrote:
> In news:h630e901pb4@enews2.newsguy.com,
> Ken Whiton typed on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:32:42 -0400:
>> I wouldn't call it an illusion. It's the difference between
>> decimal (powers of 10 - 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, etc.) and binary
>> (powers of 2 - 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, etc.) math. In decimal math,
>> kilo- is 1,000. In binary math the closest power of 2 is 1,024, so
>> that came to be known as kilo- as the closest approximation.
>> Unfortunately, as you go up the scale, the difference becomes much
>> greater.
>>
>> Decimal Binary
>>
>> KiloByte (KB) 1,000 Bytes 1,024 Bytes
>> MegaByte (MB) 1,000,000 " 1,048,576 "
>> GigaByte (GB) 1,000,000,000 " 1,073,741,824 "
>>
>> Hard drive manufacturers use decimal numbers to measure the
>> capacity of drives, so your 160 GB drive is 160,000,000,000 bytes.
>> Computers are binary devices (1/0, +/-, yes/no, however you want to
>> think of the process), so they "see" hard drives in binary terms, so
>> your computer sees that "160 GB" drive as
>> 160,000,000,000/1,073,741,824 (or 149.0116) GB. The same relationship
>> applies to all hard drives (and other storage devices) whether OEM,
>> replacement, or whatever. As you can see from this example,
>> manufacturers measure capacity decimally because it allows them to
>> claim a larger capacity for a given size drive, and years ago, when
>> the practice started, the differences weren't as significant.
>>
>>> Thanks Larry

>> You're welcome.
>>
>> Ken Whiton

>
> Also to add, don't forget the drive compacity is measured before
> formatting. Like McDonald's Quarter Pounder is a quarter pound before
> cooking. After formatting, you lose some of the free space as well.
>


The loss of some capacity due to formatting is acceptable. No matter
what the file system, you can't format a drive without taking up some
space for file system tables. And more space is left after formatting
than McDonald's gives you with a cooked Quarter Pounder.

It's Microsoft's mindless insistence on using K that is confusing to
many and downright stupid to some of us... Ben Myers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2009, 06:53 AM
Larry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Harddrive install question : size?

Ben Myers <ben_myers@charter.net> wrote in news:h63raq$at4$3
@news.eternal-september.org:

> Larry wrote:
>> Ben Myers <ben_myers@charter.net> wrote in
>> news:h62r1n$bq3$2@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> Larry wrote:
>>>> Insatalled a 160gb wd in a gateway MX6440 laptop and all i see is
>>>> 149gb totel size with 145gb free. how do i get the full drive?
>>>> Thanks Larry
>>> It all depends on how you do the math. But no matter what, 1K does
>>> not equal 1000. But then there's Microsoft math, a leftover from the
>>> days when assembly programmers would save some clock cycles by
>>> avoiding a time-consuming divide by 1000. Instead, they shifted the
>>> number right 10 bits (or dropping the rightmost 10 bits, if you'd
>>> rather)... Ben Myers
>>>

>>
>> Thanks Ben ! So 149 is the full size!. It would help if they just used
>> real numbers. You see 160 but it's a illusion.
>> Thanks Larry

>
> If you right click the drive letter in My Computer, and then click on
> Properties, you'll get to see both numbers. The honest to gosh real
> base 10 decimal number followed by the mangled-by-1K number... Ben

Myers
>


I see the numbers.
Thanks all for the info.!
Larry
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Fix your Windows Problems - FAST.
FREE Safe Scan Registry Check. Locate & Fix Errors in Minutes!
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't install Vista on SATA harddrive. Lilliputian Windows Vista Installation 7 05-02-2009 04:26 PM
Harddrive question calabash30@gmail.com Homebuilt PC 7 11-01-2008 02:36 PM
Re-install Vista on new harddrive query Barry Windows Vista 2 03-14-2008 09:12 AM
How big of a harddrive can I install businessman@nomail.com Hardware 8 12-24-2007 06:36 PM
Install an IDE harddrive on a SATA Motherboard?? TomYoung Homebuilt PC 7 07-11-2007 02:16 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2004 - 2007 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd. Usenet and forums posts © their respective authors.
Ad Management by RedTyger