Question on using lightscribe to print DVD label

Here's what kony wrote on 8/13/09:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:40:01 GMT,
> winniethepooh@100acrewoods.com (GMAN) wrote:


>> I make DVD's from peoples home movies as a home side business and i am not
>> going to write on it with a sharpie.


> Then we are talking about a different thing, the perception
> of worth in a pre-made product by being well-dressed in its
> presentation, rather than a need from a pure identification
> purpose.

I prefer nice labels on the disks I make for myself.

--
Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com

"Gene E. Bloch" <letters@someplace.invalid> wrote in mess
age news:h64sj4$3jh$1@news.albasani.net...
> Here's what kony wrote on 8/13/09:
>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:40:01 GMT,
>> winniethepooh@100acrewoods.com (GMAN) wrote:
>
>
>>> I make DVD's from peoples home movies as a home side
>>> business and i am not going to write on it with a sharpie.
>
>
>> Then we are talking about a different thing, the perception
>> of worth in a pre-made product by being well-dressed in its
>> presentation, rather than a need from a pure identification
>> purpose.
>
> I prefer nice labels on the disks I make for myself.
>
> --
> Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com
>
>

Wierd, pointless arguments over opinion (and too often over
fact) abound on usenet.

When I used DVD+RWs to archive captured video, I merely numbered
the discs and their corresponding slim jewel cases, and
maintained an HTML table as a directory to the content. I never
considered that the DVDs or their content would be kept
indefinitely - all 800 and much of their content are now gone.

A/V presently is kept here on SATA drives and the only change
needed to indexing was the letters assigned to these media.
Now, what had filled 800 DVDs would fit on four 1 terabyte
drives - about 130 cubic inches of shelf space replaced more
than 4000 cubic inches.

In article <gmXhm.267994$Ta5.57186@newsfe15.iad>, "CLicker" <CLicker@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>"Gene E. Bloch" <letters@someplace.invalid> wrote in mess
>age news:h64sj4$3jh$1@news.albasani.net...
>> Here's what kony wrote on 8/13/09:
>>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:40:01 GMT,
>>> winniethepooh@100acrewoods.com (GMAN) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> I make DVD's from peoples home movies as a home side
>>>> business and i am not going to write on it with a sharpie.
>>
>>
>>> Then we are talking about a different thing, the perception
>>> of worth in a pre-made product by being well-dressed in its
>>> presentation, rather than a need from a pure identification
>>> purpose.
>>
>> I prefer nice labels on the disks I make for myself.
>>
>> --
>> Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com
>>
>>
>
>Wierd, pointless arguments over opinion (and too often over
>fact) abound on usenet.
>
>When I used DVD+RWs to archive captured video, I merely numbered
>the discs and their corresponding slim jewel cases, and
>maintained an HTML table as a directory to the content. I never
>considered that the DVDs or their content would be kept
>indefinitely - all 800 and much of their content are now gone.
>

Rewriteables like you state are a different animal all together and it would
be retarded to put a permanant marker or ligjhtscribe label on one of those.
But i prefer to make my disks look nice. I have the time, and talent to make
my stuff look nice. I cant speak for others.



>A/V presently is kept here on SATA drives and the only change
>needed to indexing was the letters assigned to these media.
>Now, what had filled 800 DVDs would fit on four 1 terabyte
>drives - about 130 cubic inches of shelf space replaced more
>than 4000 cubic inches.
>
>
>
>

What? You arent using 2 TB drives like the rest of us are ???? LOL ! JK!

"GMAN" <winniethepooh@100acrewoods.com> wrote in message
news:ah%hm.557044$Lo1.277471@en-nntp-04.dc1.easynews.com...
> In article <gmXhm.267994$Ta5.57186@newsfe15.iad>, "CLicker"
> <CLicker@invalid.org> wrote:
>>
>>"Gene E. Bloch" <letters@someplace.invalid> wrote in mess
>>age news:h64sj4$3jh$1@news.albasani.net...
>>> Here's what kony wrote on 8/13/09:
>>>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:40:01 GMT,
>>>> winniethepooh@100acrewoods.com (GMAN) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> I make DVD's from peoples home movies as a home side
>>>>> business and i am not going to write on it with a sharpie.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Then we are talking about a different thing, the perception
>>>> of worth in a pre-made product by being well-dressed in its
>>>> presentation, rather than a need from a pure identification
>>>> purpose.
>>>
>>> I prefer nice labels on the disks I make for myself.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Wierd, pointless arguments over opinion (and too often over
>>fact) abound on usenet.
>>
>>When I used DVD+RWs to archive captured video, I merely
>>numbered
>>the discs and their corresponding slim jewel cases, and
>>maintained an HTML table as a directory to the content. I
>>never
>>considered that the DVDs or their content would be kept
>>indefinitely - all 800 and much of their content are now gone.
>>
>
> Rewriteables like you state are a different animal all
> together and it would
> be retarded to put a permanant marker or ligjhtscribe label on
> one of those.
> But i prefer to make my disks look nice. I have the time, and
> talent to make
> my stuff look nice. I cant speak for others.
>
>
>
>>A/V presently is kept here on SATA drives and the only change
>>needed to indexing was the letters assigned to these media.
>>Now, what had filled 800 DVDs would fit on four 1 terabyte
>>drives - about 130 cubic inches of shelf space replaced more
>>than 4000 cubic inches.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> What? You arent using 2 TB drives like the rest of us are ????
> LOL ! JK!

Kidding apreciated. I still wear pegged pants and fedoras, but
I'm considering bell-bottoms and a beret;-0)

Here's what CLicker wrote on 8/17/09:
> "GMAN" <winniethepooh@100acrewoods.com> wrote in message
> news:ah%hm.557044$Lo1.277471@en-nntp-04.dc1.easynews.com...
>> In article <gmXhm.267994$Ta5.57186@newsfe15.iad>, "CLicker"
>> <CLicker@invalid.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Gene E. Bloch" <letters@someplace.invalid> wrote in mess
>>>age news:h64sj4$3jh$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>> Here's what kony wrote on 8/13/09:
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:40:01 GMT,
>>>>> winniethepooh@100acrewoods.com (GMAN) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> I make DVD's from peoples home movies as a home side
>>>>>> business and i am not going to write on it with a sharpie.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Then we are talking about a different thing, the perception
>>>>> of worth in a pre-made product by being well-dressed in its
>>>>> presentation, rather than a need from a pure identification
>>>>> purpose.
>>>>
>>>> I prefer nice labels on the disks I make for myself.
>>>>
>>>> -- Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Wierd, pointless arguments over opinion (and too often over
>>>fact) abound on usenet.
>>>
>>>When I used DVD+RWs to archive captured video, I merely
>>>numbered
>>>the discs and their corresponding slim jewel cases, and
>>>maintained an HTML table as a directory to the content. I
>>>never
>>>considered that the DVDs or their content would be kept
>>>indefinitely - all 800 and much of their content are now gone.
>>>
>>
>> Rewriteables like you state are a different animal all
>> together and it would
>> be retarded to put a permanant marker or ligjhtscribe label on
>> one of those.
>> But i prefer to make my disks look nice. I have the time, and
>> talent to make
>> my stuff look nice. I cant speak for others.
>>
>>
>>
>>>A/V presently is kept here on SATA drives and the only change
>>>needed to indexing was the letters assigned to these media.
>>>Now, what had filled 800 DVDs would fit on four 1 terabyte
>>>drives - about 130 cubic inches of shelf space replaced more
>>>than 4000 cubic inches.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What? You arent using 2 TB drives like the rest of us are ????
>> LOL ! JK!

> Kidding apreciated. I still wear pegged pants and fedoras, but
> I'm considering bell-bottoms and a beret;-0)

Well, if you do that, please post a photo somewhere for us to admire
:-)

--
Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com