Been a photographer since before the Nikon F Photomic T was the hottest
thing to hang around your neck (and I did). Been through a Rollei 6x6 2.8E
Planar, a few Contaflexes, a Leica RF, some Minoltas (SRT-101), a Miranda,
Olympus, and a few Canons, etc. plus I did the permanent darkroom thing--
Durst, Schneider Componon lenses, etc. Even won a couple of amateur awards
for my stuff way back when I liven in New York.
But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now that meet
98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
On Jul 10, 7:24*am, "J.H. Holliday" <doc@okcorral> wrote:
> Been a photographer since before the Nikon F Photomic T was the hottest
> thing to hang around your neck (and I did). Been through a Rollei 6x6 2.8E
> Planar, a few Contaflexes, a Leica RF, some Minoltas (SRT-101), a Miranda,
> Olympus, and a few Canons, etc. plus I did the permanent darkroom thing-- *
> Durst, Schneider Componon lenses, etc. Even won a couple of amateur awards
> for my stuff way back when I liven in New York.
>
> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now that meet
> 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
J.H. Holliday wrote:
> Been a photographer since before the Nikon F Photomic T was the hottest
> thing to hang around your neck (and I did). Been through a Rollei 6x6 2.8E
> Planar, a few Contaflexes, a Leica RF, some Minoltas (SRT-101), a Miranda,
> Olympus, and a few Canons, etc. plus I did the permanent darkroom thing--
> Durst, Schneider Componon lenses, etc. Even won a couple of amateur awards
> for my stuff way back when I liven in New York.
>
> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now that meet
> 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
>
"Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote in message
news:suidndIFN-HtnOvVnZ2dnUVZ_oPinZ2d@supernews.com...
> J.H. Holliday wrote:
>
>> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now
>> that meet 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
>
> Cool! If you tried the Nikon D3 you would consider those Canon point and
> shoots, or anything else from Canon, akin and as primitive as rubbing two
> sticks together to produce fire.
>
>
> Rita
> --
Rita, paid shill for Nikon, probably because they could only fool an idiot
to actually shill for them.
--
God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?
> J.H. Holliday wrote:
>
>> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now
>> that meet 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
>
> Cool! If you tried the Nikon D3 you would consider those Canon point and
> shoots, or anything else from Canon, akin and as primitive as rubbing two
> sticks together to produce fire.
>
Spoken by one who drags knuckles and has cranial-rectal syndrome.
bugbear wrote:
> J.H. Holliday wrote:
>> Been a photographer since before the Nikon F Photomic T was the
>> hottest thing to hang around your neck (and I did). Been through a
>> Rollei 6x6 2.8E Planar, a few Contaflexes, a Leica RF, some Minoltas
>> (SRT-101), a Miranda, Olympus, and a few Canons, etc. plus I did the
>> permanent darkroom thing-- Durst, Schneider Componon lenses, etc.
>> Even won a couple of amateur awards for my stuff way back when I liven
>> in New York.
>>
>> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now that
>> meet 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
>
> (asbestos suit on, my friend!!)
Nah, JH don't need no 'bestos suit, my friend.
A fisherman himself, he landed the biggest troller in this here lil ole
group on one of his first casts...
On 2008-07-10, Atheist Chaplain <abused@cia.gov> wrote:
> "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:suidndIFN-HtnOvVnZ2dnUVZ_oPinZ2d@supernews.com...
>> J.H. Holliday wrote:
>>
>>> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now
>>> that meet 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
>>
>> Cool! If you tried the Nikon D3 you would consider those Canon point and
>> shoots, or anything else from Canon, akin and as primitive as rubbing two
>> sticks together to produce fire.
>>
> Rita, paid shill for Nikon, probably because they could only fool an idiot
> to actually shill for them.
>
I'm pretty sure if Nikon did pay anyone to puff their products they'd
pay a photographer. In fact, looking at the random edition of Nikon Pro
magazine beside me, they do.
On 2008-07-10, George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/08 7:32 AM, in article
> suidndIFN-HtnOvVnZ2dnUVZ_oPinZ2d@supernews.com, "Rita Berkowitz"
><ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> J.H. Holliday wrote:
>>
>>> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now
>>> that meet 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
>>
>> Cool! If you tried the Nikon D3 you would consider those Canon point and
>> shoots, or anything else from Canon, akin and as primitive as rubbing two
>> sticks together to produce fire.
>>
> Spoken by one who drags knuckles and has cranial-rectal syndrome.
>
Someone else with the anal-insertion fetish.
Has anyone heard from the hemi-powered one lately? At least he was
funny.
> Been a photographer since before the Nikon F Photomic T was the hottest
> thing to hang around your neck (and I did). Been through a Rollei 6x6 2.8E
> Planar, a few Contaflexes, a Leica RF, some Minoltas (SRT-101), a Miranda,
> Olympus, and a few Canons, etc. plus I did the permanent darkroom thing--
> Durst, Schneider Componon lenses, etc. Even won a couple of amateur awards
> for my stuff way back when I liven in New York.
>
> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now that meet
> 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
While they're obviously not the top dogs of the digital camera pack, it
*is* truly astounding what some of them can do, innit? Let's hear it for
the wonderful *range* of gear that's available today, which makes it
possible for just about everybody to find and enjoy hardware that suits
his or her needs, regardless of where on the spectrum they fall.
"savvo" <spam.goes.here@devnull.savvo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8gohk5-2nm.ln1@tog.savvo.co.uk...
> On 2008-07-10, Atheist Chaplain <abused@cia.gov> wrote:
>> "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:suidndIFN-HtnOvVnZ2dnUVZ_oPinZ2d@supernews.com...
>>> J.H. Holliday wrote:
>>>
>>>> But I gotta tell ya, I got a couple of Canon point and shoots now
>>>> that meet 98% or my photo needs. Truly amazing equipment...
>>>
>>> Cool! If you tried the Nikon D3 you would consider those Canon point
>>> and
>>> shoots, or anything else from Canon, akin and as primitive as rubbing
>>> two
>>> sticks together to produce fire.
>>>
>> Rita, paid shill for Nikon, probably because they could only fool an
>> idiot
>> to actually shill for them.
>>
>
> I'm pretty sure if Nikon did pay anyone to puff their products they'd
> pay a photographer. In fact, looking at the random edition of Nikon Pro
> magazine beside me, they do.
>
> --
> savvo orig. invib.
> man
are you implying that Rita isn't a photographer ??
--
"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg
What it's all come down to... 
Linear Mode
