Note what he says about the Point & Shoots near the end of the
article:
"I was too lazy to include a compact camera, which as I showed last
year, is abysmal compared to any DSLR. A typical compact camera, like
the Canon SD700 I use all the time, is ten times worse than any DSLR.
My SD700 at its lowest ISO 80 looks about the same as any of these
DSLRs at ISO 800! "
LOL! Even Ken Rockwell says, "Sucks to be you, Point and ****ters !!!"
Annika1980 wrote:
> My buddy, Ken Rockwell, did a recent comparison of high-ISO
> performance between DSLRs that can be found here:
> http://kenrockwell.com/tech/iso-comp...7-10/index.htm
>
> Note what he says about the Point & Shoots near the end of the
> article:
>
> "I was too lazy to include a compact camera, which as I showed last
> year, is abysmal compared to any DSLR. A typical compact camera, like
> the Canon SD700 I use all the time, is ten times worse than any DSLR.
> My SD700 at its lowest ISO 80 looks about the same as any of these
> DSLRs at ISO 800! "
>
> LOL! Even Ken Rockwell says, "Sucks to be you, Point and ****ters !!!"
>
You've got to hand it to Ken for being consistent.
For the best advice from a true professional see: http://www.proshooter.homestead.com/
I think he's the guy with numerous nicks arguing for the P&S
lobby.
Annika1980 wrote:
> My buddy, Ken Rockwell, did a recent comparison of high-ISO
> performance between DSLRs that can be found here:
> http://kenrockwell.com/tech/iso-comp...7-10/index.htm
>
> Note what he says about the Point & Shoots near the end of the
> article:
>
> "I was too lazy to include a compact camera, which as I showed last
> year, is abysmal compared to any DSLR. A typical compact camera, like
> the Canon SD700 I use all the time, is ten times worse than any DSLR.
> My SD700 at its lowest ISO 80 looks about the same as any of these
> DSLRs at ISO 800! "
>
> LOL! Even Ken Rockwell says, "Sucks to be you, Point and ****ters !!!"
>
"Annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1191470754.403476.83600@r29g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> My buddy, Ken Rockwell, did a recent comparison of high-ISO
> performance between DSLRs that can be found here:
> http://kenrockwell.com/tech/iso-comp...7-10/index.htm
>
> Note what he says about the Point & Shoots near the end of the
> article:
>
> "I was too lazy to include a compact camera, which as I showed last
> year, is abysmal compared to any DSLR. A typical compact camera, like
> the Canon SD700 I use all the time, is ten times worse than any DSLR.
> My SD700 at its lowest ISO 80 looks about the same as any of these
> DSLRs at ISO 800! "
>
> LOL! Even Ken Rockwell says, "Sucks to be you, Point and ****ters !!!"
>
And this from the greatest fan he has??? LOL with that lot.
Annika1980 wrote:
> My buddy, Ken Rockwell, did a recent comparison of high-ISO
> performance between DSLRs that can be found here:
> http://kenrockwell.com/tech/iso-comp...7-10/index.htm
>
> Note what he says about the Point & Shoots near the end of the
> article:
>
> "I was too lazy to include a compact camera, which as I showed last
> year, is abysmal compared to any DSLR. A typical compact camera, like
> the Canon SD700 I use all the time, is ten times worse than any DSLR.
> My SD700 at its lowest ISO 80 looks about the same as any of these
> DSLRs at ISO 800! "
>
> LOL! Even Ken Rockwell says, "Sucks to be you, Point and ****ters
> !!!"
I read it differently - where you have enough light for ISO 80 you may be
able to get as good a picture with a more compact and cheaper camera.
"frederick" <lost@sea.com> wrote in message
news:1191471362.371111@ftpsrv1...
> > My buddy, Ken Rockwell, did a recent comparison of high-ISO
> > performance between DSLRs that can be found here:
> > http://kenrockwell.com/tech/iso-comp...7-10/index.htm
You've got to hand it to Ken for being consistent.
For the best advice from a true professional see: http://www.proshooter.homestead.com/
I'm sure that's from the guy with numerous nicks and
numerous posts in here - fighting the good fight for the P&S
lobby.
"Annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1191470754.403476.83600@r29g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> My buddy, Ken Rockwell, did a recent comparison of high-ISO
> performance between DSLRs that can be found here:
> http://kenrockwell.com/tech/iso-comp...7-10/index.htm
>
> Note what he says about the Point & Shoots near the end of the
> article:
>
> "I was too lazy to include a compact camera, which as I showed last
> year, is abysmal compared to any DSLR. A typical compact camera, like
> the Canon SD700 I use all the time, is ten times worse than any DSLR.
> My SD700 at its lowest ISO 80 looks about the same as any of these
> DSLRs at ISO 800! "
>
> LOL! Even Ken Rockwell says, "Sucks to be you, Point and ****ters !!!"
Is that the same Ken Rockwell who slated a Pentax DSLR without even touching
one?
On Oct 4, 4:35 am, Bob Williams <mytbobnos...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, in this post, Rockwell does not SHOW any comparisons
> between P/S and DSLRs.
>I suspect the difference in
> image quality between a P/S and a DSLR at ISO 80 would be minuscule.
Roger Clark has posted a good comparison pic on his site.
Rockwell on DSLR vs. P&S 
Linear Mode
