Wayne J. Cosshall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've uploaded a new article with images I shot with my camera
> converted on infrared photography to:
> http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1035
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
Those are great. I enjoyed your work. Thanks for posting.
On 6 25 , 8 08 , "Wayne J. Cosshall" <w...@dimagemaker.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've uploaded a new article with images I shot with my camera converted
> on infrared photography to:http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1035
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> --
> Wayne J. Cosshall
> Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker,http://www.dimagemaker.com/
> Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
> Publisher, Experimental Digital Photographyhttp://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
> Personal art sitehttp://www.cosshall.com/
"Wayne J. Cosshall" <wayne@dimagemaker.com> wrote in message
news:467ef98b$0$20216$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
| Hi All,
|
| I've uploaded a new article with images I shot with my camera converted
| on infrared photography to:
| http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1035
just a thought..
The shooting I've done with Kodak and Konica IR cut through haze like a
knife. There were shots I made in the canadian Rockies where I could barely
see the next mountain, yet after deving the film I could see to the horizon.
I notice your IR converted camera tends to show the haze rather than cutting
through it - have you done any tests to see what the relative sensitivity of
the snesor is at various wavelengths?
No I haven't but it's been on my list of things to do for awhile. It may
not be so obvious from these shots but I have found my converted 350D
does cut through the haze, at least a lot.
k wrote:
> "Wayne J. Cosshall" <wayne@dimagemaker.com> wrote in message
> news:467ef98b$0$20216$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
> | Hi All,
> |
> | I've uploaded a new article with images I shot with my camera converted
> | on infrared photography to:
> | http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1035
>
>
> just a thought..
>
> The shooting I've done with Kodak and Konica IR cut through haze like a
> knife. There were shots I made in the canadian Rockies where I could barely
> see the next mountain, yet after deving the film I could see to the horizon.
>
> I notice your IR converted camera tends to show the haze rather than cutting
> through it - have you done any tests to see what the relative sensitivity of
> the snesor is at various wavelengths?
>
> karl
>
On Jun 24, 7:08 pm, "Wayne J. Cosshall" <w...@dimagemaker.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've uploaded a new article with images I shot with my camera converted
> on infrared photography to:http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1035
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> --
> Wayne J. Cosshall
> Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker,http://www.dimagemaker.com/
> Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
> Publisher, Experimental Digital Photographyhttp://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
> Personal art sitehttp://www.cosshall.com/
What is more sensitive to IR, a converted CMOS camera or a CCD-based
camera? I had heard that the Nikon D40 was the most IR-sensitive
unmodified (aside from Leica's "mistake" with the M8) DSLR.
In article <467f91c8$0$12845$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-
01.iinet.net.au>, fellafel@PING.com says...
> I notice your IR converted camera tends to show the haze rather than cutting
> through it - have you done any tests to see what the relative sensitivity of
> the snesor is at various wavelengths?
I've tried various filtration with my Fuji IS-1, from 720nm to 950nm.
Haze penetration is definitely better with deeper filtration, but quite
good even at 720nm.
Planes, Trains and Infrared Photography 
Linear Mode
