1. Start with a large directory of JPEG files (at least a few hundred
pictures, say about 400 or 500 from a normal photo shoot). These must have
a few files that are not rotated yet, but which have the proper Exif tags.
2. Select all 500 files with Irvanview "File->Thumbnails->Options->Select
All" and then press "File->JPEG Lossless Operations->Lossless Rotation With
Selected Files->Auto Rotate (according to Exif orientation, if
available)->Optimize JPG File->Apply original Exif date/time to new
file->Keep all APP markers (default)".
3. Every time I do this, only the first hundred or two hundred pictures are
rotated; the rest seem to not be touched. If I select a hundred pictures at
a time (slow at best in the Irfanview thumbnail viewer), then, over
successive operations, I can manage to auto-rotate the entire set.
This looks/smells/tastes either like user error (but where?) or a
previously unknown bug in Irfanview.
Can another confirm that Irfanview batch lossless autorotation by Exif tags
fails to run on all selected files for large numbers of files?
Susan wrote:
> Can you reproduce this WinXP Irfanview v4.10 bug?
>
> 1. Start with a large directory of JPEG files (at least a few hundred
> pictures, say about 400 or 500 from a normal photo shoot). These must have
> a few files that are not rotated yet, but which have the proper Exif tags.
>
> 2. Select all 500 files with Irvanview "File->Thumbnails->Options->Select
> All" and then press "File->JPEG Lossless Operations->Lossless Rotation With
> Selected Files->Auto Rotate (according to Exif orientation, if
> available)->Optimize JPG File->Apply original Exif date/time to new
> file->Keep all APP markers (default)".
>
> 3. Every time I do this, only the first hundred or two hundred pictures are
> rotated; the rest seem to not be touched. If I select a hundred pictures at
> a time (slow at best in the Irfanview thumbnail viewer), then, over
> successive operations, I can manage to auto-rotate the entire set.
>
> This looks/smells/tastes either like user error (but where?) or a
> previously unknown bug in Irfanview.
>
> Can another confirm that Irfanview batch lossless autorotation by Exif tags
> fails to run on all selected files for large numbers of files?
Have you emailed Irfan about this? In my experience, he's very
responsive to questions and bug reports (as much as his schedule allows
him to be, anyway).
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:11:43 -0700, Matt Ion <soundy106@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Susan wrote:
>> Can you reproduce this WinXP Irfanview v4.10 bug?
>>
>> 1. Start with a large directory of JPEG files (at least a few hundred
>> pictures, say about 400 or 500 from a normal photo shoot). These must have
>> a few files that are not rotated yet, but which have the proper Exif tags.
>>
>> 2. Select all 500 files with Irvanview "File->Thumbnails->Options->Select
>> All" and then press "File->JPEG Lossless Operations->Lossless Rotation With
>> Selected Files->Auto Rotate (according to Exif orientation, if
>> available)->Optimize JPG File->Apply original Exif date/time to new
>> file->Keep all APP markers (default)".
>>
>> 3. Every time I do this, only the first hundred or two hundred pictures are
>> rotated; the rest seem to not be touched. If I select a hundred pictures at
>> a time (slow at best in the Irfanview thumbnail viewer), then, over
>> successive operations, I can manage to auto-rotate the entire set.
>>
>> This looks/smells/tastes either like user error (but where?) or a
>> previously unknown bug in Irfanview.
>>
>> Can another confirm that Irfanview batch lossless autorotation by Exif tags
>> fails to run on all selected files for large numbers of files?
>
>Have you emailed Irfan about this? In my experience, he's very
>responsive to questions and bug reports (as much as his schedule allows
>him to be, anyway).
I have seen bugs similar to this with programs that use the MFC
CFileDialog class.
Susan wrote:
> Can you reproduce this WinXP Irfanview v4.10 bug?
>
> 1. Start with a large directory of JPEG files (at least a few hundred
> pictures, say about 400 or 500 from a normal photo shoot). These must have
> a few files that are not rotated yet, but which have the proper Exif tags.
>
> 2. Select all 500 files with Irvanview "File->Thumbnails->Options->Select
> All" and then press "File->JPEG Lossless Operations->Lossless Rotation With
> Selected Files->Auto Rotate (according to Exif orientation, if
> available)->Optimize JPG File->Apply original Exif date/time to new
> file->Keep all APP markers (default)".
>
> 3. Every time I do this, only the first hundred or two hundred pictures are
> rotated; the rest seem to not be touched. If I select a hundred pictures at
> a time (slow at best in the Irfanview thumbnail viewer), then, over
> successive operations, I can manage to auto-rotate the entire set.
>
> This looks/smells/tastes either like user error (but where?) or a
> previously unknown bug in Irfanview.
>
> Can another confirm that Irfanview batch lossless autorotation by Exif tags
> fails to run on all selected files for large numbers of files?
Don't know. I have replaced 4.1 with 4.2. Give it a try.
<tnom@mucks.net> wrote in message
news:1ur1849dl05i4bdasv8bnt5r9e9n0v626c@4ax.com...
>
>>Don't know. I have replaced 4.1 with 4.2. Give it a try.
>
> Be careful. All links from the Irfanview site that direct you to
> iview42_setup.exe, (version 4.2) contain this virus
>
>
> http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/viru...AK_Generic.001
That is not a virus. Just an alert that the executable is 'compressed'. My
opinion is that trendmicro should not have panicked in this case.
>
><tnom@mucks.net> wrote in message
>news:1ur1849dl05i4bdasv8bnt5r9e9n0v626c@4ax.com.. .
>>
>>>Don't know. I have replaced 4.1 with 4.2. Give it a try.
>>
>> Be careful. All links from the Irfanview site that direct you to
>> iview42_setup.exe, (version 4.2) contain this virus
>>
>>
>> http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/viru...AK_Generic.001
>
>That is not a virus. Just an alert that the executable is 'compressed'. My
>opinion is that trendmicro should not have panicked in this case.
>
>Sachin Garg [India]
>www.sachingarg.com | www.imagecompression.info | www.rawzor.com
No. What it is saying is that this particular file is possibly
infected because it has characteristics that are suspicious.
It has yet to be determined by Trend Micro if it actually is a
virus.
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:09:00 +0100, hummingbird
<hummingbird@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:39:20 -0400 'tnom@mucks.net'
>wrote this on alt.comp.freeware:
>
>>>Don't know. I have replaced 4.1 with 4.2. Give it a try.
>>
>>Be careful. All links from the Irfanview site that direct you to
>>iview42_setup.exe, (version 4.2) contain this virus
>>
>>
>>http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/viru...AK_Generic.001
>
>And your evidence for this is.............?
>
> <tnom@mucks.net> wrote in message
> news:1ur1849dl05i4bdasv8bnt5r9e9n0v626c@4ax.com...
>>
>>>Don't know. I have replaced 4.1 with 4.2. Give it a try.
>>
>> Be careful. All links from the Irfanview site that direct you to
>> iview42_setup.exe, (version 4.2) contain this virus
>>
>>
>> http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/viru...AK_Generic.001
>
> That is not a virus. Just an alert that the executable is 'compressed'. My
> opinion is that trendmicro should not have panicked in this case.
Great -- more FUD regarding a great piece of software (IrfanView).
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:06:14 -0400, in rec.photo.digital tnom@mucks.net
wrote:
>No. What it is saying is that this particular file is possibly
>infected because it has characteristics that are suspicious.
>It has yet to be determined by Trend Micro if it actually is a
>virus.
Then bozo why did you EXPLICITLY state the following?
>Be careful. All links from the Irfanview site that direct you to
>iview42_setup.exe, (version 4.2) contain this virus
^^^^^^^^^^^^^