Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and expensive
DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for photographic proof of the uber
incredible P & S clarity. Here it is, proof positive. I took this moon
shot from a car going 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved
mountain road:
RBrickston wrote:
> Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and expensive
> DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for photographic proof of the uber
> incredible P & S clarity. Here it is, proof positive. I took this moon
> shot from a car going 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved
> mountain road:
>
> http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...n/halfmoon.jpg
>
> Here's the equipment; I had to pull the keys out of the car's ignition to
> pull this shot off:
>
> http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...on/MynewPS.jpg
>
> Please observe environmental considerations when tossing Canon, Nikon,
> Hasselblad, etc. equipment.
You bought an expensive P&S to take *that* picture. I can't believe you
wasted all that money. What a shame.
"RBrickston" <rb20170REMOVE@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2168e4c55ebc5f06989923@news.verizon.net.. .
> Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and expensive
> DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for photographic proof of the uber
> incredible P & S clarity. Here it is, proof positive. I took this moon
> shot from a car going 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved
> mountain road:
>
> http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...n/halfmoon.jpg
>
> Here's the equipment; I had to pull the keys out of the car's ignition to
> pull this shot off:
>
> http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...on/MynewPS.jpg
>
> Please observe environmental considerations when tossing Canon, Nikon,
> Hasselblad, etc. equipment.
hmmm no EXIF info......................
--
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed
in. Some of us just go one god further.
Richard Dawkins (1941 - ), "The Root of All Evil", UK Channel 4, 2006
In article <13fu91ccjeafu47@news.supernews.com>, veatchla@yahoo.com
says...
> RBrickston wrote:
> > Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and expensive
> > DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for photographic proof of the uber
> > incredible P & S clarity. Here it is, proof positive. I took this moon
> > shot from a car going 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved
> > mountain road:
> >
> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...n/halfmoon.jpg
> >
> > Here's the equipment; I had to pull the keys out of the car's ignition to
> > pull this shot off:
> >
> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...on/MynewPS.jpg
> >
> > Please observe environmental considerations when tossing Canon, Nikon,
> > Hasselblad, etc. equipment.
>
> You bought an expensive P&S to take *that* picture. I can't believe you
> wasted all that money. What a shame.
>
> I can take that picture with my camera phone!
>
>
>
> p.s. sorry about the cross-posted reply
>
Yeah, but can you use your camera phone as a key fob? NO: Point-- P&S!
In article <fdnc0f$9r7$1@aioe.org>, abuse@cia.gov says...
> "RBrickston" <rb20170REMOVE@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.2168e4c55ebc5f06989923@news.verizon.net.. .
> > Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and expensive
> > DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for photographic proof of the uber
> > incredible P & S clarity. Here it is, proof positive. I took this moon
> > shot from a car going 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved
> > mountain road:
> >
> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...n/halfmoon.jpg
> >
> > Here's the equipment; I had to pull the keys out of the car's ignition to
> > pull this shot off:
> >
> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...on/MynewPS.jpg
> >
> > Please observe environmental considerations when tossing Canon, Nikon,
> > Hasselblad, etc. equipment.
>
> hmmm no EXIF info......................
Of course not; turned that feature off for that shot.
"RBrickston" <rb20170REMOVE@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2168ff0ca229e880989925@news.verizon.net.. .
> In article <fdnc0f$9r7$1@aioe.org>, abuse@cia.gov says...
>> "RBrickston" <rb20170REMOVE@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.2168e4c55ebc5f06989923@news.verizon.net.. .
>> > Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and expensive
>> > DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for photographic proof of the uber
>> > incredible P & S clarity. Here it is, proof positive. I took this moon
>> > shot from a car going 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved
>> > mountain road:
>> >
>> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...n/halfmoon.jpg
>> >
>> > Here's the equipment; I had to pull the keys out of the car's ignition
>> > to
>> > pull this shot off:
>> >
>> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...on/MynewPS.jpg
>> >
>> > Please observe environmental considerations when tossing Canon, Nikon,
>> > Hasselblad, etc. equipment.
>>
>> hmmm no EXIF info......................
>
> Of course not; turned that feature off for that shot.
so in essence your saying there is no proof that you didn't take it with a
DSLR and high quality lens then just crop/re-size and remove the EXIF.
****, I could take a shot this afternoon with a mates shiny new Cannon EOS
400D, remove the EXIF and post it to flikr saying I took it with my 3
megapixel camera phone ??
no credibility here folks
--
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed
in. Some of us just go one god further.
Richard Dawkins (1941 - ), "The Root of All Evil", UK Channel 4, 2006
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:47:50 GMT, the RBrickston sock puppet wrote:
> Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and
> expensive DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for
> photographic proof of the uber incredible P & S clarity. Here
> it is, proof positive. I took this moon shot from a car going
> 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved mountain road:
What an idiot. Nobody in their right mind would drive or be a
passenger in those bloated, overweight vehicles known as "cars",
when cheaper, higher quality vehicles exist that can do everything
that cars can do, and moreso. Getta Vespa and your photos will
improve to such a degree that you'll once again start taking those
award winning photos that nobody is allowed to see, Biddy.
In article <fdnd0u$c6i$1@aioe.org>, abuse@cia.gov says...
> "RBrickston" <rb20170REMOVE@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.2168ff0ca229e880989925@news.verizon.net.. .
> > In article <fdnc0f$9r7$1@aioe.org>, abuse@cia.gov says...
> >> "RBrickston" <rb20170REMOVE@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:MPG.2168e4c55ebc5f06989923@news.verizon.net.. .
> >> > Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and expensive
> >> > DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for photographic proof of the uber
> >> > incredible P & S clarity. Here it is, proof positive. I took this moon
> >> > shot from a car going 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved
> >> > mountain road:
> >> >
> >> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...n/halfmoon.jpg
> >> >
> >> > Here's the equipment; I had to pull the keys out of the car's ignition
> >> > to
> >> > pull this shot off:
> >> >
> >> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...on/MynewPS.jpg
> >> >
> >> > Please observe environmental considerations when tossing Canon, Nikon,
> >> > Hasselblad, etc. equipment.
> >>
> >> hmmm no EXIF info......................
> >
> > Of course not; turned that feature off for that shot.
>
> so in essence your saying there is no proof that you didn't take it with a
> DSLR and high quality lens then just crop/re-size and remove the EXIF.
> ****, I could take a shot this afternoon with a mates shiny new Cannon EOS
> 400D, remove the EXIF and post it to flikr saying I took it with my 3
> megapixel camera phone ??
> no credibility here folks
Oh, Please....! What's really happening is that all those great pictures
you see were taken by P & S cameras and then fake EXIF added on. They have
to wear the big strap and big a$$ed Nikon, Canon, etc. around their neck,
BUT-- they keep the triple-high-quality P & S secreted in their shirt
pocket to take the MONEY shots. Did you know that about 99% of Nat. Geo
layouts were done with P & S cameras? Even in the old days the real
equipment used were Kodak Instamatics.
In article <nreuf3tqi7ps7cvgmkgi104bkvchk49fr4@4ax.com>, caught@22.com
says...
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:47:50 GMT, the RBrickston sock puppet wrote:
>
> > Trade or simply toss in the trash bin those bulky, clumsy and
> > expensive DSLR junkers. You doubters screamed for
> > photographic proof of the uber incredible P & S clarity. Here
> > it is, proof positive. I took this moon shot from a car going
> > 85 miles an hour down a bouncing, rutted, unpaved mountain road:
>
> What an idiot. Nobody in their right mind would drive or be a
> passenger in those bloated, overweight vehicles known as "cars",
> when cheaper, higher quality vehicles exist that can do everything
> that cars can do, and moreso. Getta Vespa and your photos will
> improve to such a degree that you'll once again start taking those
> award winning photos that nobody is allowed to see, Biddy.
Hell, pal, I do fashion layouts driving by the set at 50 MPH with my P&S.
"l v" <veatchla@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13fu91ccjeafu47@news.supernews.com...
> > http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...on/MynewPS.jpg
> >
> > Please observe environmental considerations when tossing Canon, Nikon,
> > Hasselblad, etc. equipment.
>
> You bought an expensive P&S to take *that* picture. I can't believe you
> wasted all that money. What a shame.
Expensive? On which planet would that POS be expensive? :-)
Here's the picture proof on P & S Superiority 
Linear Mode
