I took some time to (hopefully) clearly explain what the focal length
reciprocal rule actually means and point out a few caveats that some
folks starting out might not know about. I suppose it's explained as
clearly as such a technical guideline can be.
Hopefully it will be helpful to someone. I know that it didn't make
perfect sense to me at first.
Aaron wrote:
> I took some time to (hopefully) clearly explain what the focal length
> reciprocal rule actually means and point out a few caveats that some
> folks starting out might not know about. I suppose it's explained as
> clearly as such a technical guideline can be.
>
> Hopefully it will be helpful to someone. I know that it didn't make
> perfect sense to me at first.
>
> http://www.singleservingphoto.com/20...ciprocal-rule/
>
> Cheers.
>
You could add Panasonic to you list of camera makers with
image stabilization built in. Theirs works very well.
"Aaron" <aaron@fisheyegallery.com> schreef in bericht
news:slrnf5n1p3.7lf.aaron@thebailiwick.com...
>I took some time to (hopefully) clearly explain what the focal length
> reciprocal rule actually means and point out a few caveats that some
> folks starting out might not know about. I suppose it's explained as
> clearly as such a technical guideline can be.
>
> Hopefully it will be helpful to someone. I know that it didn't make
> perfect sense to me at first.
>
> http://www.singleservingphoto.com/20...ciprocal-rule/
>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Aaron
> http://www.fisheyegallery.com
> http://www.singleservingphoto.com
>
Have seen the confusion in previous message.
very well explained !!! I have understand it.
I for sure will give it a try
And lo, johan <son.of.zoic@pandora.be> emerged from the ether
and spake thus:
>
> "Aaron" <aaron@fisheyegallery.com> schreef in bericht
> news:slrnf5n1p3.7lf.aaron@thebailiwick.com...
>>I took some time to (hopefully) clearly explain what the focal length
>> reciprocal rule actually means and point out a few caveats that some
>> folks starting out might not know about. I suppose it's explained as
>> clearly as such a technical guideline can be.
>>
>> Hopefully it will be helpful to someone. I know that it didn't make
>> perfect sense to me at first.
>>
>> http://www.singleservingphoto.com/20...ciprocal-rule/
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> --
>> Aaron
>> http://www.fisheyegallery.com
>> http://www.singleservingphoto.com
>>
>
> Have seen the confusion in previous message.
> very well explained !!! I have understand it.
> I for sure will give it a try
>
> Johan
>
>
And lo, Marvin <physchem@cloud9.net> emerged from the ether
and spake thus:
> Aaron wrote:
>> I took some time to (hopefully) clearly explain what the focal length
>> reciprocal rule actually means and point out a few caveats that some
>> folks starting out might not know about. I suppose it's explained as
>> clearly as such a technical guideline can be.
>>
>> Hopefully it will be helpful to someone. I know that it didn't make
>> perfect sense to me at first.
>>
>> http://www.singleservingphoto.com/20...ciprocal-rule/
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
> You could add Panasonic to you list of camera makers with
> image stabilization built in. Theirs works very well.
Theirs is also within the camera body, yes? I may do another article
later concerning the rift between fans of in-camera and in-lens image
stabilization, a topic covered here with much enthusiasm.
Aaron wrote:
> And lo, Marvin <physchem@cloud9.net> emerged from the ether
> and spake thus:
>
>>Aaron wrote:
<snip>
>>You could add Panasonic to you list of camera makers with
>>image stabilization built in. Theirs works very well.
>
>
> Theirs is also within the camera body, yes? I may do another article
> later concerning the rift between fans of in-camera and in-lens image
> stabilization, a topic covered here with much enthusiasm.
The Lumix cameras have optical image stabilisation, it's in the lens
(moving optical elements) and not the body.
Not that it realy matters, considering that the lens can't be taken off
the body anyway.
Focal length reciprocal rule explained! 
Linear Mode
