Canon 300D Autopsy

Found this on pbase:

http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy

Yoshi

On Feb 14, 8:16 pm, "Yoshi" <otakud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Found this on pbase:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
>
> Yoshi

Thanks for posting, it was very interesting. Ugliness really is
beyond skin-deep. A terrific sensor wrapped in the skin of a monster.

"Yoshi" <otakudude@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:47b4e803$0$16678$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Found this on pbase:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
>
> Yoshi
>
>
>

Photos taken with a Nikon D50 :-)

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:16:56 -0500, Yoshi wrote:

> Found this on pbase:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
>
> Yoshi

I would assume the, that the 'autopsy' was performed by another camera -
since that is what the name implies.

Ï "ray" <ray@zianet.com> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
news:61lsilF1uiptlU4@mid.individual.net...
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:16:56 -0500, Yoshi wrote:
>
> > Found this on pbase:
> >
> > http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
> >
> > Yoshi
>
> I would assume the, that the 'autopsy' was performed by another camera -
> since that is what the name implies.
No, "autopsy" means that the camera was set to automatic-"manualpsy" would
be in manual, "aperture prioritypsy"-and so on.)

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:23:59 +0200, Tzortzakakis Dimitrios wrote:

> Ã� "ray" <ray@zianet.com> Ã�ãñáøå óôï ìÞÃ*õìá
> news:61lsilF1uiptlU4@mid.individual.net...
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:16:56 -0500, Yoshi wrote:
>>
>> > Found this on pbase:
>> >
>> > http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
>> >
>> > Yoshi
>>
>> I would assume the, that the 'autopsy' was performed by another camera
>> - since that is what the name implies.
> No, "autopsy" means that the camera was set to automatic-"manualpsy"
> would be in manual, "aperture prioritypsy"-and so on.)

As I understand it - autopsy refers to the examination of the dead by a
member of the same species. Necropsy is the more general term and usually
refers to examination of a different species.

ray wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:23:59 +0200, Tzortzakakis Dimitrios wrote:
>
>> Ã� "ray" <ray@zianet.com> Ã�ãñáøå óôï ìÞÃ*õìá
>> news:61lsilF1uiptlU4@mid.individual.net...
>>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:16:56 -0500, Yoshi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Found this on pbase:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
>>>>
>>>> Yoshi
>>> I would assume the, that the 'autopsy' was performed by another camera
>>> - since that is what the name implies.
>> No, "autopsy" means that the camera was set to automatic-"manualpsy"
>> would be in manual, "aperture prioritypsy"-and so on.)
>
> As I understand it - autopsy refers to the examination of the dead by a
> member of the same species. Necropsy is the more general term and usually
> refers to examination of a different species.

Here's my D70 necropsy:
http://edgehill.net/Misc/misc-photos...-d70-dismantle
and the scene of the accident:
http://edgehill.net/Misc/photography...hed-d70/pg1pc1

On Feb 15, 11:05*am, ray <r...@zianet.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:23:59 +0200, Tzortzakakis Dimitrios wrote:
> > Ï "ray" <r...@zianet.com> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
> >news:61lsilF1uiptlU4@mid.individual.net...
> >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:16:56 -0500, Yoshi wrote:
>
> >> > Found this on pbase:
>
> >> >http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
>
> >> > Yoshi
>
> >> I would assume the, that the 'autopsy' was performed by another camera
> >> - since that is what the name implies.
> > No, "autopsy" means that the camera was set to automatic-"manualpsy"
> > would be in manual, "aperture prioritypsy"-and so on.)
>
> As I understand it - autopsy refers to the examination of the dead by a
> member of the same species. Necropsy is the more general term and usually
> refers to examination of a different species.


I was curious about the etymology awhile ago and looked it up. Means
"seen with one's own eyes": Autopsy \Au"top*sy\, noun. [from Greek
expression, from seen by one's self; self seen: compare to the French
expression autopsie. See Optic,].

BD

On 15 Feb 2008 19:05:53 GMT, ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:23:59 +0200, Tzortzakakis Dimitrios wrote:
>
>> Ï "ray" <ray@zianet.com> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
>> news:61lsilF1uiptlU4@mid.individual.net...
>>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:16:56 -0500, Yoshi wrote:
>>>
>>> > Found this on pbase:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
>>> >
>>> > Yoshi
>>>
>>> I would assume the, that the 'autopsy' was performed by another camera
>>> - since that is what the name implies.
>> No, "autopsy" means that the camera was set to automatic-"manualpsy"
>> would be in manual, "aperture prioritypsy"-and so on.)
>
>As I understand it - autopsy refers to the examination of the dead by a
>member of the same species. Necropsy is the more general term and usually
>refers to examination of a different species.

Well, it is a Nikon taking pictures of the dead Canon.

Steve

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:45:21 +0000, Steve wrote:

> On 15 Feb 2008 19:05:53 GMT, ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:23:59 +0200, Tzortzakakis Dimitrios wrote:
>>
>>> Ã� "ray" <ray@zianet.com> Ã�ãñáøå óôï ìÞÃ*õìá
>>> news:61lsilF1uiptlU4@mid.individual.net...
>>>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:16:56 -0500, Yoshi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Found this on pbase:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.pbase.com/franklin/300d_autopsy
>>>> >
>>>> > Yoshi
>>>>
>>>> I would assume the, that the 'autopsy' was performed by another
>>>> camera - since that is what the name implies.
>>> No, "autopsy" means that the camera was set to automatic-"manualpsy"
>>> would be in manual, "aperture prioritypsy"-and so on.)
>>
>>As I understand it - autopsy refers to the examination of the dead by a
>>member of the same species. Necropsy is the more general term and
>>usually refers to examination of a different species.
>
> Well, it is a Nikon taking pictures of the dead Canon.
>
> Steve

As I understand, the nikon did not do the disecting - but I could be
wrong.