Re: Boycott Panasonic cameras - forced proprietary battery use infirmware
George Kerby wrote:
>
>
> On 7/2/09 2:15 PM, in article gq1q45ddqfvo2k764kvesbqmek0leao5nh@4ax.com,
> "gary marlin" <gmarlin@gm.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:55:09 -0500, George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/2/09 11:56 AM, in article mfpp459uhqd1su7lcf6c7knf310smiqkp4@4ax.com,
>>> "gary marlin" <gmarlin@gm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:08:47 -0500, George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That's just what I thought you'd try and come up with! That tree's twigs in
>>>>> no manner would be a perch for any hawk of that size in good health.
>>>>> Bull****!
>>>> What's really bull****, is some basement-living troll like you who thinks
>>>> that little bit is the whole tree. That's all that exists of your universe
>>>> isn't it. Whatever fits between the rectangular borders of some photo or
>>>> your monitor.
>>>>
>>> Oh, so NOW you are dancing. And to be sure!
>>>
>>> Any part of the tree that it could roost on, oof ("out of frame" for your
>>> 2nd grade mind) would be several feet away. Therefore there is NO reason for
>>> one talon to still be dragging backwards. The bird, by that time, would be
>>> in cross-country position, landing gear firmly tucked. Not like it just
>>> missed some low-lying prey, or had a line attached. Nope. You are just to
>>> ignorant to understand that NO ONE buys you comp crap.
>>>
>> You appear to know as much about birds as you appear to know about cameras
>> and photography. Both amounting to little or nothing.
>>
>> Quick! What species is it? Since you're such a bird X-Spurt. There's a clue
>> in that, and why it might be taking its sweet time pulling in its landing
>> gear. (You good for nothing know-nothing basement living troll. :-) ) I
>> won't share more. But it will explain the behavior you see, perfectly, if
>> you are smart enough to deduce just that much about the bird.
>>
>> But hey! If that's the only way that you can live in that little mind of
>> yours by thinking that's an edit job, far be it from me to convince you
>> differently! It's probably going to save on your steadily increasing
>> anti-psychotic medication costs if you do just that. We wouldn't want nasty
>> ol' reality interfering in your delusions you know. Nobody wants that for
>> you.
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> :-)
>>
> Look at that, folks!
>
> I got the troll SO upset that he posted twice!!!!
>
> DING! DING! DING! DING! DING! DING! DING! DING!
>
> I get the Troll Booth Award...
Well done!
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
George Kerby wrote:
>
>
> On 7/2/09 8:55 AM, in article 4a4cbc3a$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob Larter"
> <bobbylarter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Chris H wrote:
>>> In message <4a4c3f65$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, Bob Larter
>>> <bobbylarter@gmail.com> writes
>>>> George Kerby wrote:
>>>>> On 7/1/09 12:09 PM, in article ac5n45p2ke4uka2m76okih6gtmn02ftu5j@4
>>>>> ax.com,
>>>>> "gary marlin" <gmarlin@gm.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2632/...73851cd072.jpg
>>>> And notice that the image has no EXIF data.
>>> Quite so.
>>>
>>> Also it was just the photo the link was to... whose page is it on?
>> Remember that other kook who used to post links to other people's photos
>> & pass them off as his own?
> You haven't seen "gary marlin's" latest?!?
>
> <http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/wp-...ird-catcher.jp
> g>
LOL.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Boycott Panasonic cameras - forced proprietary battery use infirmware
On 2009-07-02 08:06:17 -0700, Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> said:
> In message <4a4cbc3a$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, Bob Larter
> <bobbylarter@gmail.com> writes
>> Chris H wrote:
>>> In message <4a4c3f65$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, Bob Larter
>>> <bobbylarter@gmail.com> writes
>>>> George Kerby wrote:
>>>>> On 7/1/09 12:09 PM, in article ac5n45p2ke4uka2m76okih6gtmn02ftu5j@4
>>>>> ax.com,
>>>>> "gary marlin" <gmarlin@gm.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2632/...73851cd072.jpg
>>>> And notice that the image has no EXIF data.
>>> Quite so.
>>> Also it was just the photo the link was to... whose page is it on?
>>
>> Remember that other kook who used to post links to other people's
>> photos & pass them off as his own?
>
> I don't believe that for one moment....
>
> btw here is a photo I took last week of my girlfriend... :-)))
>
> http://www.artnewsblog.com/famous-pa...isa/mona-lisa-
> painting.jpg
Somehow the PP you used on that file sort of makes it look like an oil
painting on a board.
Re: Boycott Panasonic cameras - forced proprietary battery use in firmware
In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems J. Clarke <jclarke.usenet@cox.net> wrote:
> Charles E Hardwidge wrote:
>> Calculus used to be a university subject and only a dozen people could
>> understand relativity. Within a single lifetime this has become common
>> currency for school children.
> Sorry but General Relativity is not "common currency for school children".
> They may get a qualitative description of special relativity and a discovery
> channel type description of black holes, but they do _not_ get the math that
> is needed to really understand it. More than a few dozen people can do the
> math these days, but it's not a huge number.
> By the way, calculus being a university subject was relatively
> recent--differential calculus was taught in many high schools in the early
> part of the century, then when it turned out that little junior couldn't
> handle it, instead of simply admitting that little junior wasn't smart
> enough, the schools did the egalitarian thing and stopped teaching it. Now,
> praise the Lord, it seems to be coming back.
Not just differential calculus. I was taught both differential and
integral calculus at age 15 (in Scotland in 1956), and not just how to
do it. We were required to understand it well well enough to be able
to prove from first principles the basic theorems behind
differentiation and integration.
Nowadays the first year of university mathematics has to be taken up
covering the ground that used to be covered in school, plus revising
the stuff that has been done in school, but badly.