7D full review at dpreview

Very positive!

On Nov 6, 1:50*pm, "Charles" <charlesschu...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Very positive!

Indeed. In my review of the review, I focused on Noise and AF
performance. Check out my thoughts at:

http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=859

~~~
eNo
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1

"Charles" <charlesschuler@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:hd25no$ft2$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Very positive!

Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price.

David

David J Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>"Charles" <charlesschuler@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:hd25no$ft2$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Very positive!
>
>Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price.

Your pet feature isn't considered useful by a lot of people.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

Charles wrote:
> Very positive!

Where is RichA when we need him? :-)

--
Bertrand

Ofnuts <o.f.n.u.t.s@la.poste.net> wrote:
>Charles wrote:
>> Very positive!
>
>Where is RichA when we need him? :-)

1) Hiding
2) Writing an attack of DPReview

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

On 07 Nov 2009 18:26:58 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

>David J Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>>"Charles" <charlesschuler@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:hd25no$ft2$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Very positive!
>>
>>Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price.
>
>Your pet feature isn't considered useful by a lot of people.

It's only considered not useful by pretend-photographer trolls who have
never used any cameras at all, or uncreative snapshooters who have never
taken a photograph from any other position than standing up, camera held at
the same level as their head. Judging by how many trolls here are like
that, then you would be correct to say "isn't considered useful by a lot of
usenet trolls and ****-poor snapshooters."

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4af5bbf2$0$1628$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> David J Taylor
> <david-taylor@blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>>"Charles" <charlesschuler@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:hd25no$ft2$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Very positive!
>>
>>Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price.
>
> Your pet feature isn't considered useful by a lot of people.
>
> --
> Ray Fischer

Not a feature I use often, but one which adds considerably to the value of
Live View. A disappointing omission, IMHO.

David

Trolls Is An Endless Task <etiaet@somewhere.net> wrote:
>On 07 Nov 2009 18:26:58 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>>David J Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>>>"Charles" <charlesschuler@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>news:hd25no$ft2$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Very positive!
>>>
>>>Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price.
>>
>>Your pet feature isn't considered useful by a lot of people.
>
>It's only considered not useful by pretend-photographer trolls

People like you.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

David J Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
>> David J Taylor
>>>"Charles" <charlesschuler@comcast.net> wrote in message

>>>> Very positive!
>>>
>>>Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price.
>>
>> Your pet feature isn't considered useful by a lot of people.
>
>Not a feature I use often, but one which adds considerably to the value of
>Live View. A disappointing omission, IMHO.

Other people consider durability to be more important. A swivel
finder is a signifant weak point in any camera.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net