One old adage about photography suggests that you should
always try to "get closer." One way to do that is to use a
long lens. Another way is to actually get close to your subject.
So with that in mind I took these pics this morning.
Nothing worse than flash used for macro-photography to destroy the image. They
might as well have been taken in a staged lab setting with dead specimens.
Noce shot - I haven't seen any in a long time...and very hard to shoot
as they don't stay still - always jutting out of frame, behind the
stem, limb, branch, leaf, whatever.
On Jul 4, 6:43 pm, Ben Miller <komb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 3:39 pm, Annika1980 <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Bret this guy:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/81673031
>
> Is actually a watercress sharpshooter:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/sirchandestroy/image/45142779
>
> Noce shot - I haven't seen any in a long time...and very hard to shoot
> as they don't stay still - always jutting out of frame, behind the
> stem, limb, branch, leaf, whatever.
Yeah, that's exactly what he was doing. I had to put my hand on the
other side of the stem to get him to come around.
On Jul 4, 6:14 pm, BaumBadier <spaml...@antispam.org> wrote:
>
> Nothing worse than flash used for macro-photography to destroy the image. They
> might as well have been taken in a staged lab setting with dead specimens.
>
If they were dead then I wouldn't have needed the flash.
Without flash you are talking about long exposure times. Not such a
good idea when shooting handheld and your subject is on a leaf.
Oh yeah, here's a weather tip:
If you are ever sweating on a hot, humid day just get out the super
macro lens and try shooting bugs or flowers. It is guaranteed to make
the wind blow a nice steady breeze.
On Jul 4, 6:43 pm, Ben Miller <komb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 3:39 pm, Annika1980 <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Bret this guy:
> Is actually a watercress sharpshooter:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/sirchandestroy/image/45142779
>