Vista's Disk Defragmenter

On Apr 20, 7:02 am, RnR wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:16:14 GMT, "Paul T" <pmt1...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >RnR, Are you running the XP version of PerfectDisk in Vista?? I didn't try
> >and install it in Vista yet, waiting to hear if anyone else tried it in
> >Vista, your the first, so give me the skinny
>
> No Paul, I'm not but I think the newest version of PerfectDisk is
> Vista capable. I'm not sure if my version would work in Vista or not.
> When I go to Vista, if I must upgrade PerfectDisk in order for it to
> work right I will. I like PerfectDisk a lot. One of the best
> software (no errors yet running it often in XP for a couple of years).
>
> Just curious if anyone knows howDiskeepervs PerfectDisk compares?
> Years ago, it would go back and forth but I haven't kept up with it
> lately. PerfectDisk for me has been perfect to my knowledge. Sorry
> if I sound like a commercial ... disclaimer: I have no finanical
> interest to PerfectDisk.

PerfectDisk is certified for Vista, Diskeeper is compatable, if that
matters to you.
This is from a vendor, but still interesting:
http://www.raxco.com/products/perfec...omparisons.cfm

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:06:58 +0100, ruben
<ruben.6e8199@computerbanter.com> wrote:

>I 've been on Diskeeper, 2007 is awesome, slick GUI and neat features.
>Stopped the scheduled defrags and have got it running all the time, no
>issues whatsoever.

Oh great, another program I am going to have to buy! I had Diskkeeper
10 and they used the TROJAN Installishield update to sneakily
recommend upgrades, not updates. I kill Installshiels update most of
my time but sometimes I see what it says. I have scripts to kill
processes selectively so it's easy.

But I know I am going to have to fork out for Diskkeeper, and possibly
Paper Port. I am still going to try to get as much free software as I
can, legally.