I used to have a program that was supposed to be better than
SyncbackSE at the time but now I forgot it's name and can't seem to
find it (I thought I still had it). I admit its possible now that
SyncbackSE is better but I'd like to recall that other name to compare
myself now. I think Journey mentioned its name about 6 months or so
ago but perhaps that is of no help now. Any suggestions for programs
similar to SyncbackSE that you like better? No need to explain why as
I'll research that myself. Appreciate the help.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:35:46 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>I used to have a program that was supposed to be better than
>SyncbackSE at the time but now I forgot it's name and can't seem to
>find it (I thought I still had it). I admit its possible now that
>SyncbackSE is better but I'd like to recall that other name to compare
>myself now. I think Journey mentioned its name about 6 months or so
>ago but perhaps that is of no help now. Any suggestions for programs
>similar to SyncbackSE that you like better? No need to explain why as
>I'll research that myself. Appreciate the help.
Maybe found what I was looking for????
I think it is called ViceVersa but for some reason that doesn't ring
any bells so I don't know. I'll all ears (ok eyes) if any other
suggestions pop up. thanks all.
RnR wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:35:46 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I used to have a program that was supposed to be better than
>> SyncbackSE at the time but now I forgot it's name and can't seem to
>> find it (I thought I still had it). I admit its possible now that
>> SyncbackSE is better but I'd like to recall that other name to compare
>> myself now. I think Journey mentioned its name about 6 months or so
>> ago but perhaps that is of no help now. Any suggestions for programs
>> similar to SyncbackSE that you like better? No need to explain why as
>> I'll research that myself. Appreciate the help.
>
>
> Maybe found what I was looking for????
> I think it is called ViceVersa but for some reason that doesn't ring
> any bells so I don't know. I'll all ears (ok eyes) if any other
> suggestions pop up. thanks all.
It's found here; http://www.tgrmn.com/
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:01:23 -0400, Pen <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>RnR wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:35:46 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I used to have a program that was supposed to be better than
>>> SyncbackSE at the time but now I forgot it's name and can't seem to
>>> find it (I thought I still had it). I admit its possible now that
>>> SyncbackSE is better but I'd like to recall that other name to compare
>>> myself now. I think Journey mentioned its name about 6 months or so
>>> ago but perhaps that is of no help now. Any suggestions for programs
>>> similar to SyncbackSE that you like better? No need to explain why as
>>> I'll research that myself. Appreciate the help.
>>
>>
>> Maybe found what I was looking for????
>> I think it is called ViceVersa but for some reason that doesn't ring
>> any bells so I don't know. I'll all ears (ok eyes) if any other
>> suggestions pop up. thanks all.
>It's found here;
>http://www.tgrmn.com/
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:35:46 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>I used to have a program that was supposed to be better than
>SyncbackSE at the time but now I forgot it's name and can't seem to
>find it (I thought I still had it). I admit its possible now that
>SyncbackSE is better but I'd like to recall that other name to compare
>myself now. I think Journey mentioned its name about 6 months or so
>ago but perhaps that is of no help now. Any suggestions for programs
>similar to SyncbackSE that you like better? No need to explain why as
>I'll research that myself. Appreciate the help.
I use Second Copy for my backups and it works great for me but I never
did any comparison with other products. Not sure if that's what
you're looking for. If not, it was someone else that mentioned the
product you are looking for.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:24:28 -0500, journey <jouney@merr.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:35:46 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I used to have a program that was supposed to be better than
>>SyncbackSE at the time but now I forgot it's name and can't seem to
>>find it (I thought I still had it). I admit its possible now that
>>SyncbackSE is better but I'd like to recall that other name to compare
>>myself now. I think Journey mentioned its name about 6 months or so
>>ago but perhaps that is of no help now. Any suggestions for programs
>>similar to SyncbackSE that you like better? No need to explain why as
>>I'll research that myself. Appreciate the help.
>
>I use Second Copy for my backups and it works great for me but I never
>did any comparison with other products. Not sure if that's what
>you're looking for. If not, it was someone else that mentioned the
>product you are looking for.
thanks Journey. I think that's the one (seems to ring a bell in my
head) so I'll investigate that one. Appreciate the reminder.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:32:57 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:24:28 -0500, journey <jouney@merr.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:35:46 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I used to have a program that was supposed to be better than
>>>SyncbackSE at the time but now I forgot it's name and can't seem to
>>>find it (I thought I still had it). I admit its possible now that
>>>SyncbackSE is better but I'd like to recall that other name to compare
>>>myself now. I think Journey mentioned its name about 6 months or so
>>>ago but perhaps that is of no help now. Any suggestions for programs
>>>similar to SyncbackSE that you like better? No need to explain why as
>>>I'll research that myself. Appreciate the help.
>>
>>I use Second Copy for my backups and it works great for me but I never
>>did any comparison with other products. Not sure if that's what
>>you're looking for. If not, it was someone else that mentioned the
>>product you are looking for.
>
>
>thanks Journey. I think that's the one (seems to ring a bell in my
>head) so I'll investigate that one. Appreciate the reminder.
I use the program for one purpose, but it's very flexible for anyone
who needs a more complex backup process. I use it only to back up
relatively static volumes or folders to external USB drives. For
example, my iTunes music library backup is always backed up
automatically. I keep almost all of my installs on a hard disk, and
that is backed up automatically too. If you try it please post an
update to this thread letting us know if you find it useful.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:50:47 -0500, journey <jouney@merr.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:32:57 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:24:28 -0500, journey <jouney@merr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:35:46 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I used to have a program that was supposed to be better than
>>>>SyncbackSE at the time but now I forgot it's name and can't seem to
>>>>find it (I thought I still had it). I admit its possible now that
>>>>SyncbackSE is better but I'd like to recall that other name to compare
>>>>myself now. I think Journey mentioned its name about 6 months or so
>>>>ago but perhaps that is of no help now. Any suggestions for programs
>>>>similar to SyncbackSE that you like better? No need to explain why as
>>>>I'll research that myself. Appreciate the help.
>>>
>>>I use Second Copy for my backups and it works great for me but I never
>>>did any comparison with other products. Not sure if that's what
>>>you're looking for. If not, it was someone else that mentioned the
>>>product you are looking for.
>>
>>
>>thanks Journey. I think that's the one (seems to ring a bell in my
>>head) so I'll investigate that one. Appreciate the reminder.
>
>I use the program for one purpose, but it's very flexible for anyone
>who needs a more complex backup process. I use it only to back up
>relatively static volumes or folders to external USB drives. For
>example, my iTunes music library backup is always backed up
>automatically. I keep almost all of my installs on a hard disk, and
>that is backed up automatically too. If you try it please post an
>update to this thread letting us know if you find it useful.
If I decide to use it, I will. That said, if I don't, nothing
personal. I'm going to look at 4 or 5 choices but right now, not sure
my priorities except it has to be able to compare to an external drive
(I think many choices do that now). Other than that, I guess next
would be what I find easiest to read. What I like may not be the one
with the most features.