On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:44:33 -0400, "Ryan Lomax"
<lowmax33@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>"zynteq7" <spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote in message
>news:48406d49$0$7032$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Del...York,5483.html
>
>Dell has really went down hill. You can buy Dell at WalMart, Staples, Best
>Buy, etc.
>
Should I believe you OR the stockholders as of May 30th ? Or to put
it another way.... If I believe you then I should NOT believe that
their sales and revenue went up as of May 30th. This may be hard to
believe but just Google it and you will confirm what I just wrote.
And if memory serves me right, one news report I read said their
laptop sales was a major reason for all of this.
journey wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 20:58:30 -0400, zynteq7
> <spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>
>> Colin Wilson wrote:
>>>>> So sorry I was busy reading alt.alt.alt.alt.flonk for the last few years...
>>>> Nothing personal. We were just joking with you. I'm sure I'm
>>>> speaking for the rest ... we welcome you !
>>> Agreed - sorry if it sounded like I was a bit too sarcastic !
>> Thanks for the clairification, it's ok I actually I can't remember
>> what flonk actually means (I've seen the NG in crossposts in
>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk) *looking up the word flonk now...* Hmmm, I can't
>> find anything sensical, but then again I guess that's part of the NG.
>
> Are you sure it's not "plonk"?
nope, I know the definition of "plonk", this one is flonk
"Boogie Woogie" <piano@music> wrote in message
news:-5CdncUHwb_vcN7VnZ2dnUVZ_vninZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Ryan Lomax" <lowmax33@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:%nH0k.48$2q7.41@newsfe02.lga...
>>
>>
>> Dell has really went down hill. You can buy Dell at WalMart, Staples,
>> Best Buy, etc.
>>
>
> ...not unlike your grammar ;-)
>
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:44:54 -0400, zynteq7
<spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>journey wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 May 2008 20:58:30 -0400, zynteq7
>> <spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>>
>>> Colin Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> So sorry I was busy reading alt.alt.alt.alt.flonk for the last few years...
>>>>> Nothing personal. We were just joking with you. I'm sure I'm
>>>>> speaking for the rest ... we welcome you !
>>>> Agreed - sorry if it sounded like I was a bit too sarcastic !
>>> Thanks for the clairification, it's ok I actually I can't remember
>>> what flonk actually means (I've seen the NG in crossposts in
>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk) *looking up the word flonk now...* Hmmm, I can't
>>> find anything sensical, but then again I guess that's part of the NG.
>>
>> Are you sure it's not "plonk"?
>
>nope, I know the definition of "plonk", this one is flonk
I do not know the definition of "flonk". Can you educate me?
At least one definition is not intended for young ears and eyes and certainly
not intended for polite discourse... Ben Myers
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:33:39 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:44:54 -0400, zynteq7
><spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>
>>journey wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 May 2008 20:58:30 -0400, zynteq7
>>> <spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Colin Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> So sorry I was busy reading alt.alt.alt.alt.flonk for the last few years...
>>>>>> Nothing personal. We were just joking with you. I'm sure I'm
>>>>>> speaking for the rest ... we welcome you !
>>>>> Agreed - sorry if it sounded like I was a bit too sarcastic !
>>>> Thanks for the clairification, it's ok I actually I can't remember
>>>> what flonk actually means (I've seen the NG in crossposts in
>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk) *looking up the word flonk now...* Hmmm, I can't
>>>> find anything sensical, but then again I guess that's part of the NG.
>>>
>>> Are you sure it's not "plonk"?
>>
>>nope, I know the definition of "plonk", this one is flonk
>
>
>I do not know the definition of "flonk". Can you educate me?
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:44:54 -0400, zynteq7
<spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>journey wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 May 2008 20:58:30 -0400, zynteq7
>> <spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>>
>>> Colin Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> So sorry I was busy reading alt.alt.alt.alt.flonk for the last few years...
>>>>> Nothing personal. We were just joking with you. I'm sure I'm
>>>>> speaking for the rest ... we welcome you !
>>>> Agreed - sorry if it sounded like I was a bit too sarcastic !
>>> Thanks for the clairification, it's ok I actually I can't remember
>>> what flonk actually means (I've seen the NG in crossposts in
>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk) *looking up the word flonk now...* Hmmm, I can't
>>> find anything sensical, but then again I guess that's part of the NG.
>>
>> Are you sure it's not "plonk"?
>
>nope, I know the definition of "plonk", this one is flonk
OK, just wanted to be sure. Homer Simpson says something too but I
forgot what it is. "Plonk" seems on the way out, but I've never heard
of "flonk". Would you consider using pflonk? That way you're covered
both ways. ;-)
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:54:19 -0400, "Boogie Woogie" <piano@music>
wrote:
>"Ryan Lomax" <lowmax33@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:%nH0k.48$2q7.41@newsfe02.lga...
>>
>>
>> Dell has really went down hill. You can buy Dell at WalMart, Staples, Best
>> Buy, etc.
>>
>
>...not unlike your grammar ;-)
Wouldn't pflonk be something in German, like the old coin denomination pfennig?
.... Ben Myers
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:12:16 -0500, journey <journey@merr.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:44:54 -0400, zynteq7
><spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>
>>journey wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 May 2008 20:58:30 -0400, zynteq7
>>> <spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Colin Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> So sorry I was busy reading alt.alt.alt.alt.flonk for the last few years...
>>>>>> Nothing personal. We were just joking with you. I'm sure I'm
>>>>>> speaking for the rest ... we welcome you !
>>>>> Agreed - sorry if it sounded like I was a bit too sarcastic !
>>>> Thanks for the clairification, it's ok I actually I can't remember
>>>> what flonk actually means (I've seen the NG in crossposts in
>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk) *looking up the word flonk now...* Hmmm, I can't
>>>> find anything sensical, but then again I guess that's part of the NG.
>>>
>>> Are you sure it's not "plonk"?
>>
>>nope, I know the definition of "plonk", this one is flonk
>
>OK, just wanted to be sure. Homer Simpson says something too but I
>forgot what it is. "Plonk" seems on the way out, but I've never heard
>of "flonk". Would you consider using pflonk? That way you're covered
>both ways. ;-)
verb To Flonk: To stimulate the male sexual organ. Especially
auto-stimulation in a noisy manner. This word definitely has
onomatopoetic characteristics. Synonym: Masturbate.
Did you spend all night flonking it to softcore ****?
Ivar flonks constantly.
The internet results in highly flonktastic behavior on the part
of the male population.
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:33:39 -0500, RnR <rnrtexas@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:44:54 -0400, zynteq7
><spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>
>>journey wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 May 2008 20:58:30 -0400, zynteq7
>>> <spamluncheonmeat@angina.biz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Colin Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> So sorry I was busy reading alt.alt.alt.alt.flonk for the last few years...
>>>>>> Nothing personal. We were just joking with you. I'm sure I'm
>>>>>> speaking for the rest ... we welcome you !
>>>>> Agreed - sorry if it sounded like I was a bit too sarcastic !
>>>> Thanks for the clairification, it's ok I actually I can't remember
>>>> what flonk actually means (I've seen the NG in crossposts in
>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk) *looking up the word flonk now...* Hmmm, I can't
>>>> find anything sensical, but then again I guess that's part of the NG.
>>>
>>> Are you sure it's not "plonk"?
>>
>>nope, I know the definition of "plonk", this one is flonk
>
>
>I do not know the definition of "flonk". Can you educate me?
Never mind now. Googled it and found it on urbandictionary.com .
Yep, not a word I need to use especially on a daily basis.