On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:01:25 -0500 'J. Clarke'
wrote this on alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati:
>ATIuser wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:47:06 -0500 'J. Clarke'
>> wrote this on alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati:
>>
>>> ATIuser wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:25:17 +0000 'Craig Coope'
>>>> wrote this on alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:51:26 -0500, "J. Clarke"
>>>>> <jclarke.usenet@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> First of One wrote:
>>>>>>> "Craig Coope" <coope1999@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:nlduj3tl0cel6pr88orr0too5l294cfabd@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> I;m still trying to figure out why my Samsung Syncmaster
>>>>>>>>> win't
>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>> me DVI...anyway...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ever tried the monitor drivers from Samsung's web site?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://org.downloadcenter.samsung.com/downloadfile/ContentsFile.aspx?CDSite=CA&CttFileID=1229221&CDCt tType=DR&ModelType=N&ModelName=226BW&VPath=DR/200703/20070314100735343_SM226BW.exe>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The monitor doesn't display and EDID or DDC info..and it gets
>>>>>>>>> detected as a CRT using Omega drivers for my X1950 Pro...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is any of this normal?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Back in 2004, there was a fiasco with the Samsung 191T, where
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> monitor's
>>>>>>> EDID info when connected via DVI, was erroneously programmed by
>>>>>>> Samsung to
>>>>>>> show an analog monitor. It is possible your 226BW is afflicted
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, there are few utilities that will read/write the EDID
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> monitor
>>>>>>> connected via DVI. Dell has a utility, but it only runs on
>>>>>>> nVidia
>>>>>>> cards. Do
>>>>>>> you or any of your friends have an nVidia card?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry for all the tpyos!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As long as the first and last letters of each word, and the
>>>>>>> length
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>> word, are correct, the human mind will interpolate the rest.
>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>> works for
>>>>>>> about 55% of the people. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As larg as toe fight and lent laddies of elah wind, ard tie
>>>>>> lettoh
>>>>>> of epah wild, ate couplet, tee hymen mudd weil illitterate tre
>>>>>> rapt.
>>>>>> Toes wells far anent 55% of tae pintle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only really works if there's context.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> That doesn't work!...You're supposed to have the first and last
>>>>> letters in the right place....
>>>>
>>>> Correct ... and it also implies that words with three letters
>>>> cannot be messed with.
>>
>>> Why can't they? The middle letter would appear to be fair game
>>> unless there is another rule.
>>
>> The interpolation theory applies when the first/last letters remain
>> intact and only letters *between* them are switched around. In a
>> three letter word, there is no other letter in the word to switch
>> the middle letter around with.
>
>It wasn't stated
by whom? btw - I should have also mentioned that the word length
has to be the same.
>that the intervening letters may only be transposed,
>not substituted.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:14:33 -0500 'J. Clarke'
wrote this on alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati:
>Craig Coope wrote:
>> I won't go on.....
>The fact that even with the paragraph from which it was derived there
>as an example, you were unable to recognize the altered version
>suggests that either there is something wrong with the theory or that
>the rules as stated were incomplete.
IIRC the full rules are:
1.the first and last letters must remain intact.
2.word length must remain the same.
3.only letters between the first/last can be switched around,
so no changing letters, and this implies no messing with words
of 3 chars or less.
ATIuser wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:01:25 -0500 'J. Clarke'
> wrote this on alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati:
>
>> ATIuser wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:47:06 -0500 'J. Clarke'
>>> wrote this on alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati:
>>>
>>>> ATIuser wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:25:17 +0000 'Craig Coope'
>>>>> wrote this on alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:51:26 -0500, "J. Clarke"
>>>>>> <jclarke.usenet@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First of One wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Craig Coope" <coope1999@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:nlduj3tl0cel6pr88orr0too5l294cfabd@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> I;m still trying to figure out why my Samsung Syncmaster
>>>>>>>>>> win't
>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>> me DVI...anyway...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ever tried the monitor drivers from Samsung's web site?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <http://org.downloadcenter.samsung.com/downloadfile/ContentsFile.aspx?CDSite=CA&CttFileID=1229221&CDCt tType=DR&ModelType=N&ModelName=226BW&VPath=DR/200703/20070314100735343_SM226BW.exe>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The monitor doesn't display and EDID or DDC info..and it
>>>>>>>>>> gets
>>>>>>>>>> detected as a CRT using Omega drivers for my X1950 Pro...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is any of this normal?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Back in 2004, there was a fiasco with the Samsung 191T, where
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> monitor's
>>>>>>>> EDID info when connected via DVI, was erroneously programmed
>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>> Samsung to
>>>>>>>> show an analog monitor. It is possible your 226BW is
>>>>>>>> afflicted
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, there are few utilities that will read/write the
>>>>>>>> EDID
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> monitor
>>>>>>>> connected via DVI. Dell has a utility, but it only runs on
>>>>>>>> nVidia
>>>>>>>> cards. Do
>>>>>>>> you or any of your friends have an nVidia card?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry for all the tpyos!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As long as the first and last letters of each word, and the
>>>>>>>> length
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>>> word, are correct, the human mind will interpolate the rest.
>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>> works for
>>>>>>>> about 55% of the people. :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As larg as toe fight and lent laddies of elah wind, ard tie
>>>>>>> lettoh
>>>>>>> of epah wild, ate couplet, tee hymen mudd weil illitterate tre
>>>>>>> rapt.
>>>>>>> Toes wells far anent 55% of tae pintle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only really works if there's context.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> That doesn't work!...You're supposed to have the first and last
>>>>>> letters in the right place....
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct ... and it also implies that words with three letters
>>>>> cannot be messed with.
>>>
>>>> Why can't they? The middle letter would appear to be fair game
>>>> unless there is another rule.
>>>
>>> The interpolation theory applies when the first/last letters
>>> remain
>>> intact and only letters *between* them are switched around. In a
>>> three letter word, there is no other letter in the word to switch
>>> the middle letter around with.
>>
>> It wasn't stated
>
> by whom?
By anyone posting in this thread.
> btw - I should have also mentioned that the word length
> has to be the same.
That _was_ stated.
>> that the intervening letters may only be transposed,
>> not substituted.
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Re: No EDID 
Linear Mode
