dayvall wrote:
> Could anyone please tell me if the 4850 will work ok on PCI-E 1.0 board
> and if so how much performace do you lose from a PCI-E 2.0 motherboard ?
I have a 4850 running on an old Asus M2N-E motherboard.
--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04.1) Linux 2.6.26.1
^ ^ 18:35:01 up 4 days 20 min 2 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.00
? ? (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...ub_addressesa/
On Aug 6, 6:39*am, "Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)"
<toylet.toy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> dayvall wrote:
> > Could anyone please tell me if the 4850 will work ok on PCI-E 1.0 board
> > and if so how much performace do you lose from a PCI-E 2.0 motherboard ?
>
> I have a 4850 running on an old Asus M2N-E motherboard.
I am running it on a Dell Precision 470, PCI-E 1.0 and its fine.
As to losing speed, all things are not necessarily equal. In theory
PCI-E was twice as fast as AGP, but I recall AGP cards with the same
GPU beating their PCI-E cousins with similar MBs.
You probably won't see a difference unless you are using very fast
components everywhere else.
"dayvall" <fern@fern.com> wrote in message
news:_Zemk.220588$oo.8942@newsfe09.ams2...
> Could anyone please tell me if the 4850 will work ok on PCI-E 1.0 board
> and if so how much performace do you lose from a PCI-E 2.0 motherboard ?
>
> Cheers
>
>
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:24:54 +0100, "dayvall" <fern@fern.com> wrote:
>Could anyone please tell me if the 4850 will work ok on PCI-E 1.0 board and
>if so how much performace do you lose from a PCI-E 2.0 motherboard ?
Should work fine. In most cases there will be very little to none in
performance-difference. There are some situation where PCI-E 2.0 might
give over 5 % increase, but those are quite rare...
--
Clas Mehus
- "Den som har flest prylar när han dör vinner..."