HowToFixComputers.com




Watched TopicsWatched Topics SearchSearch RegisterRegister Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages ProfileProfile Log inLog in
Looking for an Athlon XP 2800+ vs. Pentium-4 2.8C Benchmark

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Index -> CPU
Author Message
Christian Drewing
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:57 pm    Post subject: Looking for an Athlon XP 2800+ vs. Pentium-4 2.8C Benchmark Reply with quote

I give it up. Can someone hlp me? Not even Tomshardware can give me
the benchmark I need.

Thanks a lot,
Christian.
Back to top
JohnFol
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2003 7:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Looking for an Athlon XP 2800+ vs. Pentium-4 2.8C Benchm Reply with quote

Found this on TomsHardware. . .

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030513/athlon_xp-17.html



"Christian Drewing" <Christian_Drewing.20.cdrewing@spamgourmet.com> wrote in
message news:6e13d75e.0309020557.6fe55377@posting.google.com...
Quote:
I give it up. Can someone hlp me? Not even Tomshardware can give me
the benchmark I need.

Thanks a lot,
Christian.
Back to top
Tony Hill
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:05 am    Post subject: Re: Looking for an Athlon XP 2800+ vs. Pentium-4 2.8C Benchm Reply with quote

On 2 Sep 2003 06:57:08 -0700,
Christian_Drewing.20.cdrewing@spamgourmet.com (Christian Drewing)
wrote:
Quote:
I give it up. Can someone hlp me? Not even Tomshardware can give me
the benchmark I need.

Here, try this out:

http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1834

It's actually reviewing the P4 3.2GHz chip, but it includes benchmarks
with quite a number of P4 and AthlonXP chips, including both the 2.8C
GHz P4 and the AthlonXP 2800+.

Long story short, P4 is going to be faster for sure, the AthlonXP will
be cheaper. If you're looking at a dollar for dollar comparison, the
AthlonXP 3000+ vs. P4 2.8C GHz is a more accurate comparison.
Personally though, I would recommend the P4 2.6C GHz, since it'll
usually save you a decent little bit of cash for only a small loss in
performance. Intel's new i865PE and i875P chipsets are quite
attractive now, and this combo can make for a very fast and cost
effective base (though fortunately now that nVidia is making chipsets
for AMD, you can get a very good quality board for either processor).

--------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca
Back to top
Never anonymous Bud
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:26 am    Post subject: Re: Looking for an Athlon XP 2800+ vs. Pentium-4 2.8C Benchm Reply with quote

Separating himself from Baghdad Bob,
Christian_Drewing.20.cdrewing@spamgourmet.com (Christian Drewing) whined:

Quote:
"JohnFol" <Wibble@wobble.com> wrote in message news:<O825b.195$8m4.146@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net>...
Found this on TomsHardware. . .

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030513/athlon_xp-17.html


Nah, this is a Pentium-4 2.80 not a 2.80C. So I need the benchmark
with hyperthreading CPUs.

I don't remember where I got it, but I have a Seti@home benchmark comparison,
it shows a P4 2.8C at 1 hour 37 minutes,
and an Athlon 3200 at 2 hours 11 minutes.

In real life, my Barton 2500@2700 takes between 2.5 and 3 hours per unit,
my P4 2.6C @2750 takes 3-3.3 hours, but processes 2 units at the same time,
in that time.

Running Encarta 2005 Enterprise Edition, the P4 system with 512 megs of ram
was noticeably smoother and faster than my Barton with 1 gig of ram.








To reply by email, remove the XYZ.

Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.

It's your SIG, say what you want to say....
Back to top
chrisv
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Looking for an Athlon XP 2800+ vs. Pentium-4 2.8C Benchm Reply with quote

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:26:02 GMT, Never anonymous Bud
<thekat@san.rxyzr.com> wrote:

Quote:
I don't remember where I got it, but I have a Seti@home benchmark comparison,
it shows a P4 2.8C at 1 hour 37 minutes,
and an Athlon 3200 at 2 hours 11 minutes.

In real life, my Barton 2500@2700 takes between 2.5 and 3 hours per unit,
my P4 2.6C @2750 takes 3-3.3 hours, but processes 2 units at the same time,
in that time.

Running Encarta 2005 Enterprise Edition, the P4 system with 512 megs of ram
was noticeably smoother and faster than my Barton with 1 gig of ram.

It's good times for us Intel fans. 8)



----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Back to top
NM
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 4:20 am    Post subject: Re: Looking for an Athlon XP 2800+ vs. Pentium-4 2.8C Benchm Reply with quote

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:26:02 +0000, Never anonymous Bud wrote:

Quote:
I don't remember where I got it, but I have a Seti@home benchmark
comparison, it shows a P4 2.8C at 1 hour 37 minutes, and an Athlon 3200 at
2 hours 11 minutes.

In real life, my Barton 2500@2700 takes between 2.5 and 3 hours per unit,
my P4 2.6C @2750 takes 3-3.3 hours, but processes 2 units at the same
time, in that time.

This is the crappiest benchmark you could find. Absolutely irrelevant to
any kind of daily use, unless -- maybe -- your main use for your PC is HPC
(High Performance Computing), which I doubt it is.

And then, if you actually did HPC, you would recompile your software with
"-march=athlon-xp -mfpmath=sse -mfast-math", and you'd get much better
results.
Back to top
Keith R. Williams
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:50 am    Post subject: Re: Looking for an Athlon XP 2800+ vs. Pentium-4 2.8C Benchm Reply with quote

In article <8jdelvcp0qf1a5t63o13fblupigjmif8dr@4ax.com>,
chrisv@nospam.invalid says...
Quote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:26:02 GMT, Never anonymous Bud
thekat@san.rxyzr.com> wrote:

I don't remember where I got it, but I have a Seti@home benchmark comparison,
it shows a P4 2.8C at 1 hour 37 minutes,
and an Athlon 3200 at 2 hours 11 minutes.

In real life, my Barton 2500@2700 takes between 2.5 and 3 hours per unit,
my P4 2.6C @2750 takes 3-3.3 hours, but processes 2 units at the same time,
in that time.

Running Encarta 2005 Enterprise Edition, the P4 system with 512 megs of ram
was noticeably smoother and faster than my Barton with 1 gig of ram.

It's good times for us Intel fans. 8)

....and we all know Intel processors need all the fans they can
get! ;-)

--
Keith
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Index -> CPU All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

 MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups



Powered by p|-|pBB

Featured Sites: DIY Projects