HowToFixComputers.com




Watched TopicsWatched Topics SearchSearch RegisterRegister Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages ProfileProfile Log inLog in
S1590 memory bandwidth

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Index -> Tyan
Author Message
Dave
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 11:04 pm    Post subject: S1590 memory bandwidth Reply with quote

I'm in the process of putting together an old machine for use as a secondary
computer for young kids. I have a limited selection of memory available
since I wish to spend as little as possible on this machine and use pieces
that I already have. I was wondering which combination of ram on the S1590
might give better performance with Win98SE, 64MB of PC100 or 128 MB of PC66
(combined as one 64 MB PC100 module and two 32 MB modules of PC66 all
running at 66 MHz or the AGP bus speed as noted in the Tyan manual)?

Thanks, Dave
Back to top
André Janz
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:08 pm    Post subject: Re: S1590 memory bandwidth Reply with quote

Dave wrote:

Quote:
I'm in the process of putting together an old machine for use as a secondary
computer for young kids. I have a limited selection of memory available
since I wish to spend as little as possible on this machine and use pieces
that I already have. I was wondering which combination of ram on the S1590
might give better performance with Win98SE, 64MB of PC100 or 128 MB of PC66
(combined as one 64 MB PC100 module and two 32 MB modules of PC66 all
running at 66 MHz or the AGP bus speed as noted in the Tyan manual)?

I assume you want to put a FSB100 cpu on the board? In that case it
depends on what programs you want to run. Most socket7 CPUs are already
bandwidth-starved which is not made better by combining them with 66MHz
RAM instead of 100MHz RAM. OTOH if the system starts swapping with only
64MB then 128MB of (slower) RAM will still give a better total performance.
The S1590 does have 1MB L2 cache so maybe PC66 RAM is not so bad in that
case.

Just put everything together and try which will run faster, we can't
give you any definitive answer.

André
Back to top
Dave
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:07 pm    Post subject: Re: S1590 memory bandwidth Reply with quote

André Janz wrote:
Quote:

Dave wrote:

I'm in the process of putting together an old machine for use as a
secondary computer for young kids. I have a limited selection of
memory available since I wish to spend as little as possible on this
machine and use pieces that I already have. I was wondering which
combination of ram on the S1590 might give better performance with
Win98SE, 64MB of PC100 or 128 MB of PC66 (combined as one 64 MB PC100
module and two 32 MB modules of PC66 all running at 66 MHz or the AGP
bus speed as noted in the Tyan manual)?

I assume you want to put a FSB100 cpu on the board? In that case it
depends on what programs you want to run. Most socket7 CPUs are already
bandwidth-starved which is not made better by combining them with 66MHz
RAM instead of 100MHz RAM. OTOH if the system starts swapping with only
64MB then 128MB of (slower) RAM will still give a better total
performance. The S1590 does have 1MB L2 cache so maybe PC66 RAM is not
so bad in that case.

Thanks for the reply. Sorry about the lack of extra information regarding
the CPU. It will have a K6-2 500 and I'll be using a VooDoo3 3000 for the
video card.

Dave
Back to top
André Janz
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:08 am    Post subject: Re: S1590 memory bandwidth Reply with quote

Dave wrote:

Quote:
André Janz wrote:

Dave wrote:

I'm in the process of putting together an old machine for use as a
secondary computer for young kids. I have a limited selection of
memory available since I wish to spend as little as possible on this
machine and use pieces that I already have. I was wondering which
combination of ram on the S1590 might give better performance with
Win98SE, 64MB of PC100 or 128 MB of PC66 (combined as one 64 MB PC100
module and two 32 MB modules of PC66 all running at 66 MHz or the AGP
bus speed as noted in the Tyan manual)?

I assume you want to put a FSB100 cpu on the board? In that case it
depends on what programs you want to run. Most socket7 CPUs are already
bandwidth-starved which is not made better by combining them with 66MHz
RAM instead of 100MHz RAM. OTOH if the system starts swapping with only
64MB then 128MB of (slower) RAM will still give a better total
performance. The S1590 does have 1MB L2 cache so maybe PC66 RAM is not
so bad in that case.

Thanks for the reply. Sorry about the lack of extra information regarding
the CPU. It will have a K6-2 500 and I'll be using a VooDoo3 3000 for the
video card.

Now that CPU is nearly as bandwidth starved as possible (apart from
maybe K6-2 550) but as I said *maybe* the 1MB L2 cache will help. At
least the additional 64MB are cached (not like on Intel TX chipset).
I think it really depends on the applications you want to run on it.
Give it a try with 64MB and if you experience swapping add the other 64MB.

http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherboard/19980731/socket7-02.html
"VIA's MVP3 chipset allows you to use a synchronous or asynchronous mode
for your memory, which means that the main memory runs at a lower bus
speed than the CPU and the important L2 cache. You can run your PC-66
SDRAM or EDO at 66 MHz while the 2nd level cache and CPU runs at 100 MHz
(memory asynchronously) or run the memory synchronously at 83 or 75 MHz.
This is particularly interesting for all users who want to upgrade, but
don't want to buy new memory again. In case of asynchronously running 66
MHz EDO RAM you will see about 80-90%, whilst 66 MHz PC66 SDRAM will
offer you 85-97% of the performance achieved with PC100 SDRAM running
synchronously at 100 MHz."

So you will lose at most 15% of performance.

André
Back to top
Dave
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:34 am    Post subject: Re: S1590 memory bandwidth Reply with quote

André Janz wrote:
Quote:

Dave wrote:

André Janz wrote:

Dave wrote:

I'm in the process of putting together an old machine for use as a
secondary computer for young kids. I have a limited selection of
memory available since I wish to spend as little as possible on this
machine and use pieces that I already have. I was wondering which
combination of ram on the S1590 might give better performance with
Win98SE, 64MB of PC100 or 128 MB of PC66 (combined as one 64 MB PC100
module and two 32 MB modules of PC66 all running at 66 MHz or the AGP
bus speed as noted in the Tyan manual)?

I assume you want to put a FSB100 cpu on the board? In that case it
depends on what programs you want to run. Most socket7 CPUs are already
bandwidth-starved which is not made better by combining them with 66MHz
RAM instead of 100MHz RAM. OTOH if the system starts swapping with only
64MB then 128MB of (slower) RAM will still give a better total
performance. The S1590 does have 1MB L2 cache so maybe PC66 RAM is not
so bad in that case.

Thanks for the reply. Sorry about the lack of extra information
regarding the CPU. It will have a K6-2 500 and I'll be using a VooDoo3
3000 for the video card.

Now that CPU is nearly as bandwidth starved as possible (apart from
maybe K6-2 550) but as I said *maybe* the 1MB L2 cache will help. At
least the additional 64MB are cached (not like on Intel TX chipset).
I think it really depends on the applications you want to run on it.
Give it a try with 64MB and if you experience swapping add the other 64MB.

http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherboard/19980731/socket7-02.html
"VIA's MVP3 chipset allows you to use a synchronous or asynchronous mode
for your memory, which means that the main memory runs at a lower bus
speed than the CPU and the important L2 cache. You can run your PC-66
SDRAM or EDO at 66 MHz while the 2nd level cache and CPU runs at 100 MHz
(memory asynchronously) or run the memory synchronously at 83 or 75 MHz.
This is particularly interesting for all users who want to upgrade, but
don't want to buy new memory again. In case of asynchronously running 66
MHz EDO RAM you will see about 80-90%, whilst 66 MHz PC66 SDRAM will
offer you 85-97% of the performance achieved with PC100 SDRAM running
synchronously at 100 MHz."

So you will lose at most 15% of performance.


Thanks for the extra info. I'll run a benchmark to try and determine if
there's a noticeable difference between the two configurations.

Dave
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Index -> Tyan All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

 MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups



Powered by p|-|pBB

Featured Sites: DIY Projects