HowToFixComputers.com




Watched TopicsWatched Topics SearchSearch RegisterRegister Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages ProfileProfile Log inLog in
Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Index -> Scanners
Author Message
Talal Itani
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:15 pm    Post subject: Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70 Reply with quote

My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77, Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani
Back to top
Cari
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:16 am    Post subject: Re: Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70 Reply with quote

Standalone scanners have come down in price because so many folks have
switched to All in One printers. Personally I prefer the standalones and
have had no problems with my LiDE80.
--
Cari (MS-MVP)
Windows Technologies - Printing & Imaging
http://www.coribright.com/windows

"Talal Itani" <titani@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:CKMWh.5823$Fs6.1211@trnddc03...
Quote:

My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77, Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I
have a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document.
These Canon scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why
are they so inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70 Reply with quote

On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" <tit...@verizon.net> wrote:
Quote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77, Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.
Back to top
Talal Itani
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70 Reply with quote

<mark.thomas.7@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177416091.720898.184520@c18g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" <tit...@verizon.net> wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77,
Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I
have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These
Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.


I will only scan black and white text documents. Even with that I am
worried, $44.77 is an amazing price for a scanner. By the way, can jewelry
be scanned with a scanner?
Back to top
CSM1
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70 Reply with quote

"Talal Itani" <titani@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:DDmXh.9830$no.4774@trnddc02...
Quote:

mark.thomas.7@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177416091.720898.184520@c18g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" <tit...@verizon.net> wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77,
Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I
have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These
Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.


I will only scan black and white text documents. Even with that I am
worried, $44.77 is an amazing price for a scanner. By the way, can
jewelry be scanned with a scanner?

Absolutely, if the scanner's sensor is a CCD type.
Just look at jewelry on Ebay.

A lot of the jewelry is from a scanner. Some are from a digital camera.

--
CSM1
http://www.carlmcmillan.com
--
Back to top
Fix your Windows Problems - FAST.
FREE Safe Scan Registry Check. Locate & Fix Errors in Minutes!
CSM1
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:32 am    Post subject: Re: Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70 Reply with quote

"Talal Itani" <titani@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:l3tXh.3332$nR1.2671@trnddc06...
Quote:

"CSM1" <nomail@nomoremail.com> wrote in message
news:eqsXh.43$tp5.16@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Talal Itani" <titani@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:DDmXh.9830$no.4774@trnddc02...

mark.thomas.7@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177416091.720898.184520@c18g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" <tit...@verizon.net> wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and
I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77,
Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since
I have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These
Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they
so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.


I will only scan black and white text documents. Even with that I am
worried, $44.77 is an amazing price for a scanner. By the way, can
jewelry be scanned with a scanner?

Absolutely, if the scanner's sensor is a CCD type.
Just look at jewelry on Ebay.

A lot of the jewelry is from a scanner. Some are from a digital camera.


This is very interesting. If the jewelry is flat, like a coin, I can see
how it can be scanned. But, what about rings, bracelets, can they also be
scanned with a flatbed?




Yes, them too.

A CCD sensor had a fair amount of Depth of Field, and focuses up to about an
inch of so from the top of the Platen.

How far the focus extends is specific to the scanner.
My Canon Canoscan 8400F goes to about 1/2 inch above the platen.

--
CSM1
http://www.carlmcmillan.com
--
Back to top
Talal Itani
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:32 am    Post subject: Re: Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70 Reply with quote

"CSM1" <nomail@nomoremail.com> wrote in message
news:eqsXh.43$tp5.16@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
Quote:
"Talal Itani" <titani@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:DDmXh.9830$no.4774@trnddc02...

mark.thomas.7@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177416091.720898.184520@c18g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" <tit...@verizon.net> wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77,
Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I
have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These
Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they
so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.


I will only scan black and white text documents. Even with that I am
worried, $44.77 is an amazing price for a scanner. By the way, can
jewelry be scanned with a scanner?

Absolutely, if the scanner's sensor is a CCD type.
Just look at jewelry on Ebay.

A lot of the jewelry is from a scanner. Some are from a digital camera.


This is very interesting. If the jewelry is flat, like a coin, I can see
how it can be scanned. But, what about rings, bracelets, can they also be
scanned with a flatbed?
Back to top
PCLIVE
Forum Regular
Forum Regular


Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70 Reply with quote

Talal Itani wrote:
"CSM1" <nomail@nomoremail.com> wrote in message
news:eqsXh.43$tp5.16@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...

This is very interesting. If the jewelry is flat, like a coin, I can see
how it can be scanned. But, what about rings, bracelets, can they also be
scanned with a flatbed?


Yes, but as others have said, you will need a CCD scanner in order to get a good scanned image. The LiDE 25 and LiDE 70 both use a CIS (Contact Image Sensor) for scanning. The CanoScan 8600F uses a CCD for scanning.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Index -> Scanners All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

 MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups



Powered by p|-|pBB

Featured Sites: DIY Projects