|
|
| Author |
Message |
Doug
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: Intel P4's: why so cheap on the L1 cache? |
 |
|
My old Athlon XP had 64KB instruction + 64KB data L1 cache, why did Intel go
so cheap and only include 16KB data and 12Ku-op on the P4's? Hell, even the
K62's had 32KB instruction + 32KB data w/their L1 cache! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fix your Windows Problems - FAST.
FREE Safe Scan Registry Check. Locate & Fix Errors in Minutes!
|
|
Joe Pfeiffer
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:25 am Post subject: Re: Intel P4's: why so cheap on the L1 cache? |
|
|
"Doug" <noone@nowhere.com> writes:
| Quote: | My old Athlon XP had 64KB instruction + 64KB data L1 cache, why did Intel go
so cheap and only include 16KB data and 12Ku-op on the P4's? Hell, even the
K62's had 32KB instruction + 32KB data w/their L1 cache!
|
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/580459.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amy Lee
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:35 pm Post subject: Re: Intel P4's: why so cheap on the L1 cache? |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:19:16 +0000, Doug wrote:
| Quote: | My old Athlon XP had 64KB instruction + 64KB data L1 cache, why did Intel go
so cheap and only include 16KB data and 12Ku-op on the P4's? Hell, even the
K62's had 32KB instruction + 32KB data w/their L1 cache!
Because Intel just sells his band, not technology. I love AMD as you love. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Watched Topics
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Profile
Log in
Memberlist
Usergroups