|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Yousuf Khan
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:42 am Post subject: Windows Vista content protection: a big long suicide note |
 |
|
The full text is available at the following site (it's kinda long, but
interesting):
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
| Quote: | A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection
===================================================
Peter Gutmann, pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Last updated 23 December 2006
Executive Summary
-----------------
Windows Vista includes an extensive reworking of core OS elements in order to
provide content protection for so-called "premium content", typically HD data
from Blu-Ray and HD-DVD sources. Providing this protection incurs
considerable costs in terms of system performance, system stability, technical
support overhead, and hardware and software cost. These issues affect not
only users of Vista but the entire PC industry, since the effects of the
protection measures extend to cover all hardware and software that will ever
come into contact with Vista, even if it's not used directly with Vista (for
example hardware in a Macintosh computer or on a Linux server). This document
analyses the cost involved in Vista's content protection, and the collateral
damage that this incurs throughout the computer industry.
Executive Executive Summary
---------------------------
The Vista Content Protection specification could very well constitute the
longest suicide note in history.
Introduction
------------
This document looks purely at the cost of the technical portions of Vista's
content protection. The political issues (under the heading of DRM) have been
examined in exhaustive detail elsewhere and won't be commented on further,
unless it's relevant to the cost analysis. However, one important point that
must be kept in mind when reading this document is that in order to work,
Vista's content protection must be able to violate the laws of physics,
something that's unlikely to happen no matter how much the content industry
wishes it were possible. This conundrum is displayed over and over again in
the Windows content-protection specs, with manufacturers being given no hard-
and-fast guidelines but instead being instructed that they need to display as
much dedication as possible to the party line. The documentation is peppered
with sentences like:
"It is recommended that a graphics manufacturer go beyond the strict letter
of the specification and provide additional content-protection features,
because this demonstrates their strong intent to protect premium content".
This is an exceedingly strange way to write technical specifications, but is
dictated by the fact that what the spec is trying to achieve is fundamentally
impossible. Readers should keep this requirement to display appropriate
levels of dedication in mind when reading the following analysis [Note A]. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Jan Panteltje
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:56 pm Post subject: Re: Windows Vista content protection: a big long suicide not |
|
|
On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Dec 2006 22:42:32 -0500) it happened Yousuf Khan
<gigayjk.news.bbbl67@spamgourmet.com> wrote in
<RumdnaohxeG3Bw3Y4p2dnA@giganews.com>:
Thank you, that was informative.
We will find a way around it and bury Balmer's company in the process.
Happy New Year :-)
I will post you link to comp.os.linux.development.apps and sci.electronics.design. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
  |
Index
-> CPU |
All times are GMT
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
| |
Watched Topics
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Profile
Log in
Memberlist
Usergroups