|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 2:43 am Post subject: Should I run Cat5 to WAP or use a Powerline adapter? |
 |
|
I have a Linksys with Speedboater (WRT54GS) router upstairs in my home.
The wireless signal is not strong enough in parts of the house
downstairs so I am using a WRE54G Linksys Range Extender. It works okay
but signal is weak.
I do not transfer a lot of files but just want it for Internet, Email.
I may want an occasional file transfer (30 minute show using Tivo
Desktop) from Tivo box downstairs to desktop upstairs.
___
1. I can get someone to run Cat5 for me from upstairs to downstairs and
perhaps add a WAP Router from some manufacturer and thus get a stronger
signal.
Cable Cost and labor: $150
or
2. I could buy some NetGear Powerline adapters and then attach a WAP to
the one downstairs.
NetGear Powerline Cost: I guess about $200
____________
******Thoughts, comments as it relates to speed, cost, reliability.
Also any recommendation on hardware WAP.
(I guess I could use 3rd party WRT software for my router and boost the
signal. I did at one time try SVEASOFT and bricked the router).
Thanks, Patty |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fix your Windows Problems - FAST.
FREE Safe Scan Registry Check. Locate & Fix Errors in Minutes!
|
|
BR
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: Re: Should I run Cat5 to WAP or use a Powerline adapter? |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:46:42 -0700, $Bill wrote:
| Quote: | I've never used wireless (so far), what about picking up a Pre-N router
? You'd have to check, but I think they have a much wider range than the
G routers (try Netgear/Linksys sites for specs). They cost more, but
the total may be less than your other solutions and they're faster.
Someone with some experience should be able to help more.
|
Hmmm. I know the antenna(s) on those routers attaches in the back. But
couldn't one add some cable and place the antenna (or a better one) in a
better spot? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
$Bill
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: Re: Should I run Cat5 to WAP or use a Powerline adapter? |
|
|
pattyjamas@hotmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | I have a Linksys with Speedboater (WRT54GS) router upstairs in my home.
The wireless signal is not strong enough in parts of the house
downstairs so I am using a WRE54G Linksys Range Extender. It works okay
but signal is weak.
I do not transfer a lot of files but just want it for Internet, Email.
I may want an occasional file transfer (30 minute show using Tivo
Desktop) from Tivo box downstairs to desktop upstairs.
|
I've never used wireless (so far), what about picking up a Pre-N router ?
You'd have to check, but I think they have a much wider range than the
G routers (try Netgear/Linksys sites for specs). They cost more, but
the total may be less than your other solutions and they're faster.
Someone with some experience should be able to help more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Warren
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:12 am Post subject: Re: Should I run Cat5 to WAP or use a Powerline adapter? |
|
|
$Bill wrote:
| Quote: | pattyjamas@hotmail.com wrote:
I have a Linksys with Speedboater (WRT54GS) router upstairs in my home.
The wireless signal is not strong enough in parts of the house
downstairs so I am using a WRE54G Linksys Range Extender. It works okay
but signal is weak.
I do not transfer a lot of files but just want it for Internet, Email.
I may want an occasional file transfer (30 minute show using Tivo
Desktop) from Tivo box downstairs to desktop upstairs.
I've never used wireless (so far), what about picking up a Pre-N router
?
You'd have to check, but I think they have a much wider range than the
G routers (try Netgear/Linksys sites for specs). They cost more, but
the total may be less than your other solutions and they're faster.
Someone with some experience should be able to help more.
|
I'd avoid the pre-N stuff unless it's absolutely necessary. Pre-N isn't N.
And there's no money-back guarantee that the firmware will be able to be
updated to N when it comes out. You may be stuck with pre-N equipment that
will only talk to pre-N equipment of the same brand, or else it'll
fall-back to G.
In most marginal situations, I've seen Netgear's RangeMax equipment work
better than Linksys's SpeedBoost. The gap is less if you compare RangeMax
to Linksys's SRX. But again we're talking about non-standard equipment.
You need all matching equipment, or it just falls back to plain-old G.
So if you're not willing to spend the money update both the router and the
NIC's, or if you can't wait until the N standard equipment becomes
available next year, playing around with the placement of the equipment
may be the best bet. Keep the router as far away as practical from other
electric equipment that might not be shielded very well. Keep it away from
any CRT-style monitors. Keep it away from the cablemodem. Keep it away
from cordless phones also working in the 2.4 range. Keep it away from your
microwave oven. A 7' Ethernet cable to move it to the other end of the
desk may be a better investment than a new router and new NIC's.
--
Warren H.
==========
Disclaimer: My views reflect those of myself, and not my
employer, my friends, nor (as she often tells me) my wife.
Any resemblance to the views of anybody living or dead is
coincidental. No animals were hurt in the writing of this
response -- unless you count my dog who desperately wants
to go outside now.
Power Lawncare Tools for Spring Clean-up:
http://www.holzemville.com/mall/blackanddecker/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:41 pm Post subject: Re: Should I run Cat5 to WAP or use a Powerline adapter? |
|
|
Thanks all.
I have high gain antennas on the Linksys router and the pre-n stuff has
had some bad reviews with the new models being weaker than the current
ones.
Anyone know the speed difference of Powerline versus perhaps me running
Cat5 to a Wireless Access Point?
Thanks
Patty
Warren wrote:
| Quote: | $Bill wrote:
pattyjamas@hotmail.com wrote:
I have a Linksys with Speedboater (WRT54GS) router upstairs in my home.
The wireless signal is not strong enough in parts of the house
downstairs so I am using a WRE54G Linksys Range Extender. It works okay
but signal is weak.
I do not transfer a lot of files but just want it for Internet, Email.
I may want an occasional file transfer (30 minute show using Tivo
Desktop) from Tivo box downstairs to desktop upstairs.
I've never used wireless (so far), what about picking up a Pre-N router
?
You'd have to check, but I think they have a much wider range than the
G routers (try Netgear/Linksys sites for specs). They cost more, but
the total may be less than your other solutions and they're faster.
Someone with some experience should be able to help more.
I'd avoid the pre-N stuff unless it's absolutely necessary. Pre-N isn't N.
And there's no money-back guarantee that the firmware will be able to be
updated to N when it comes out. You may be stuck with pre-N equipment that
will only talk to pre-N equipment of the same brand, or else it'll
fall-back to G.
In most marginal situations, I've seen Netgear's RangeMax equipment work
better than Linksys's SpeedBoost. The gap is less if you compare RangeMax
to Linksys's SRX. But again we're talking about non-standard equipment.
You need all matching equipment, or it just falls back to plain-old G.
So if you're not willing to spend the money update both the router and the
NIC's, or if you can't wait until the N standard equipment becomes
available next year, playing around with the placement of the equipment
may be the best bet. Keep the router as far away as practical from other
electric equipment that might not be shielded very well. Keep it away from
any CRT-style monitors. Keep it away from the cablemodem. Keep it away
from cordless phones also working in the 2.4 range. Keep it away from your
microwave oven. A 7' Ethernet cable to move it to the other end of the
desk may be a better investment than a new router and new NIC's.
--
Warren H.
==========
Disclaimer: My views reflect those of myself, and not my
employer, my friends, nor (as she often tells me) my wife.
Any resemblance to the views of anybody living or dead is
coincidental. No animals were hurt in the writing of this
response -- unless you count my dog who desperately wants
to go outside now.
Power Lawncare Tools for Spring Clean-up:
http://www.holzemville.com/mall/blackanddecker/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Bill Crocker
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:58 am Post subject: Re: Should I run Cat5 to WAP or use a Powerline adapter? |
|
|
<pattyjamas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158364045.530023.195310@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[clipped]
| Quote: | 1. I can get someone to run Cat5 for me from upstairs to downstairs and
perhaps add a WAP Router from some manufacturer and thus get a stronger
signal.
Cable Cost and labor: $150
or
2. I could buy some NetGear Powerline adapters and then attach a WAP to
the one downstairs.
NetGear Powerline Cost: I guess about $200
[clipped]
Thanks, Patty
|
I had exactly the same scenario in my home! I tried all the brand name
802.11B, and G devices, with mixed, and inconsistent results. Then I tried
two different name brand power-line network link devices. These would work
very well at times, and be totally unreliable at other times. Possibly due
to electrical noise on the power lines, but not from any devices in my home,
after the process of elimination.
The solution to all my problems (other than hardwiring CAT5), was Netgear's
WGM124 Pre-N WiFi Router! Not only did it solve the connectivity, but the
link is always fast! It's also the first router that I was able to
implement WPA-PSK security on as well!
Bill Crocker |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| |
Watched Topics
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Profile
Log in
Memberlist
Usergroups